OASIS XML Localisation Interchange File Format (XLIFF) TC

 View Only

  • 1.  ITS rules for 2.1

    Posted 10-09-2016 16:35
    Hi Felix, all, I think there are a few issues in the itsm.sch file that includes the rules: 1) The 'res' prefix is used in one of the selector, but it's not defined in the file. 2) The element its:localizationNoteRule should probably be its:locNoteRule 3) The attribute locNoteType is required but is missing in the its:locNoteRule. 4) There is also the addition problem of deciding how to map alert and description to the XLIFF 'priority' values. 5) The element its:allowedCharatersRule should be its:allowedCharactersRule I've attached a corrected file for some of the issues, in case that an help. Cheers, -yves Attachment: itsm.sch Description: Binary data


  • 2.  RE: [xliff] ITS rules for 2.1

    Posted 10-09-2016 17:05
    One more: We have a rule for Terminology: <its:termRule selector="//xlf:mrk[@type='term' and @ref]" termInfoRefPointer="@ref"/> But we are probably missing one that maps type="itsm:term-no" to its:term="no" -ys
    Original Message


  • 3.  Re: [xliff] ITS rules for 2.1

    Posted 10-10-2016 05:46
    Thanks a lot for these fixes, Yves. How do we now proceed OASIS process wise? Is it OK to just put a new version of the file into SVN? Best, Felix > Am 09.10.2016 um 19:04 schrieb Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>: > > One more: > > We have a rule for Terminology: > > <its:termRule selector="//xlf:mrk[@type='term' and @ref]" termInfoRefPointer="@ref"/> > > But we are probably missing one that maps type="itsm:term-no" to its:term="no" > > -ys > > >
    Original Message


  • 4.  Re: [xliff] ITS rules for 2.1

    Posted 10-10-2016 08:28
    Thanks, Yves, Felix, we can't make changes to the trunk artifacts until the public review is over. BTW it hasn't even started. Even the vote to start the review has not been completed.. You should probably make a branch and we can fix the trunk version based on a comment in a month or so.. Cheers dF On Oct 10, 2016 07:46, "Felix Sasaki" < felix@sasakiatcf.com > wrote: Thanks a lot for these fixes, Yves. How do we now proceed OASIS process wise? Is it OK to just put a new version of the file into SVN? Best, Felix > Am 09.10.2016 um 19:04 schrieb Yves Savourel < ysavourel@enlaso.com >: > > One more: > > We have a rule for Terminology: > >        <its:termRule selector="//xlf:mrk[@type=' term' and @ref]" termInfoRefPointer="@ref"/> > > But we are probably missing one that maps type="itsm:term-no" to its:term="no" > > -ys > > >
    Original Message


  • 5.  Re: [xliff] ITS rules for 2.1

    Posted 10-10-2016 16:51
    Thanks, David - I created the separate branch, taking Yves’ two comments into account. The branch just contains the updated rules file. - Felix Am 10.10.2016 um 10:27 schrieb David Filip < david.filip@adaptcentre.ie >: Thanks, Yves, Felix, we can't make changes to the trunk artifacts until the public review is over. BTW it hasn't even started. Even the vote to start the review has not been completed.. You should probably make a branch and we can fix the trunk version based on a comment in a month or so.. Cheers dF On Oct 10, 2016 07:46, Felix Sasaki < felix@sasakiatcf.com > wrote: Thanks a lot for these fixes, Yves. How do we now proceed OASIS process wise? Is it OK to just put a new version of the file into SVN? Best, Felix > Am 09.10.2016 um 19:04 schrieb Yves Savourel < ysavourel@enlaso.com >: > > One more: > > We have a rule for Terminology: > >        <its:termRule selector= //xlf:mrk[@type=' term' and @ref] termInfoRefPointer= @ref /> > > But we are probably missing one that maps type= itsm:term-no to its:term= no > > -ys > > >
    Original Message


Related Content