OASIS XML Localisation Interchange File Format (XLIFF) TC

Hi Rodolfo, all, While working on the toolkit implementation I noticed that the 'original' attribute of <file> is optional in the schema, but mandatory in specification. Which is it? Also, if were to have a problem like this after final publication (which hopefully we won't), I would assume the specification would be the definite word, right? Happy 4th July, -yves

At this stage, if there is a difference between the schema and the specification then it's my mistake. After the specification becomes approved, the specification becomes normative and the schema becomes secondary. The TC has to decide whether the "original" attribute is required or optional. I would think it should be optional, as not all XLIFF documents may have a source file. Regards, Rodolfo -- Rodolfo M. Raya rmraya@maxprograms.com Maxprograms http://www.maxprograms.com > -----Original Message----- > From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [ mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org ] On Behalf > Of Yves Savourel > Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 2:05 PM > To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [xliff] original attribute > > Hi Rodolfo, all, > > While working on the toolkit implementation I noticed that the 'original' > attribute of <file> is optional in the schema, but mandatory in specification. > > Which is it? > > Also, if were to have a problem like this after final publication (which > hopefully we won't), I would assume the specification would be the definite > word, right? > > Happy 4th July, > -yves > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: xliff-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org > For additional commands, e-mail: xliff-help@lists.oasis-open.org

Hi, I would agree that "original" should be an optional attribute. Regards, Fredrik Estreen > -----Original Message----- > From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [ mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org ] On Behalf > Of Rodolfo M. Raya > Sent: den 4 juli 2012 19:19 > To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [xliff] original attribute > > At this stage, if there is a difference between the schema and the > specification then it's my mistake. > > After the specification becomes approved, the specification becomes > normative and the schema becomes secondary. > > The TC has to decide whether the "original" attribute is required or optional. I > would think it should be optional, as not all XLIFF documents may have a > source file. > > Regards, > Rodolfo > -- > Rodolfo M. Raya rmraya@maxprograms.com > Maxprograms http://www.maxprograms.com > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [ mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org ] > > On Behalf Of Yves Savourel > > Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 2:05 PM > > To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org > > Subject: [xliff] original attribute > > > > Hi Rodolfo, all, > > > > While working on the toolkit implementation I noticed that the 'original' > > attribute of <file> is optional in the schema, but mandatory in specification. > > > > Which is it? > > > > Also, if were to have a problem like this after final publication > > (which hopefully we won't), I would assume the specification would be > > the definite word, right? > > > > Happy 4th July, > > -yves > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: xliff-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: xliff-help@lists.oasis-open.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: xliff-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org > For additional commands, e-mail: xliff-help@lists.oasis-open.org >

+1 -----Original Message----- From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [ mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org ] On Behalf Of Estreen, Fredrik Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 7:31 AM To: Rodolfo M. Raya; xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [xliff] original attribute Hi, I would agree that "original" should be an optional attribute. Regards, Fredrik Estreen > -----Original Message----- > From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [ mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org ] > On Behalf Of Rodolfo M. Raya > Sent: den 4 juli 2012 19:19 > To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [xliff] original attribute > > At this stage, if there is a difference between the schema and the > specification then it's my mistake. > > After the specification becomes approved, the specification becomes > normative and the schema becomes secondary. > > The TC has to decide whether the "original" attribute is required or > optional. I would think it should be optional, as not all XLIFF > documents may have a source file. > > Regards, > Rodolfo > -- > Rodolfo M. Raya rmraya@maxprograms.com > Maxprograms http://www.maxprograms.com > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [ mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org ] > > On Behalf Of Yves Savourel > > Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 2:05 PM > > To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org > > Subject: [xliff] original attribute > > > > Hi Rodolfo, all, > > > > While working on the toolkit implementation I noticed that the 'original' > > attribute of <file> is optional in the schema, but mandatory in specification. > > > > Which is it? > > > > Also, if were to have a problem like this after final publication > > (which hopefully we won't), I would assume the specification would > > be the definite word, right? > > > > Happy 4th July, > > -yves > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: xliff-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: xliff-help@lists.oasis-open.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: xliff-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org > For additional commands, e-mail: xliff-help@lists.oasis-open.org >