Hello Martin,
as additional hint for a workaround:
The AdES profile "Advanced Electronic Signature
Profiles of the OASIS Digital Signature Service Version 1.0"
(http://docs.oasis-open.org/dss/v1.0/oasis-dss-profiles-AdES-spec-v1.0-os.html)
currently only applies to XAdES and CAdES, **but** as the
AdES URI's are often used for PAdES (as well in commercial products) to
be able to specify what type of PAdES is required, in the meantime this
is a possible work-around.
Hope this helps,
Stefan.
Am 18.11.13 13:28, schrieb Stefan Drees:
> Hello Martin,
>
> sorry for answering now and not earlier, but discussions profit from
> taking some time :-)
>
>
> The TC has discussed the matter and in the meantime has analyzed, that
> either the DSS core specification must be ammended with an additional
> section on PDF signatures (as well as the AdES profile) or a new PAdES
> profile must be created.
>
>
> I hope this helps. I will answer Thomas' mail along the same lines just
> to make sure all dsicussion threads are in sync.
>
> All the best,
> Stefan.
>
> Am 07.10.13 01:20, schrieb Martin Boßlet:
>> Hello Stefan,
>>
>> was it possible to discuss PAdES integration during the last
>> conference call?
>>
>> Thanks a lot in advance,
>> Martin
>>
>> 2013/8/27 Stefan Drees <
stefan@drees.name>:
>>> Hello Martin,
>>>
>>> au contraire, we are sorry to not have answered earlier.
>>>
>>> We are in the midst of a summer break with the committee activities.
>>>
>>> The next conference call is September, 9th from 1800 CEST when we will
>>> discuss your comments, suggestsions and questions.
>>>
>>> All the best and again sorry for not responding earlier.
>>>
>>> Stefan Drees
>>> Co-Chair of DSS-X
>>>
>>> Am 24.08.13 00:25, schrieb Martin Boßlet:
>>>
>>>> Hello Juan, hello Stefan,
>>>>
>>>> sorry for addressing you directly! I sent a mail (included at the end
>>>> for reference) to the old dss-dev mailing list a few weeks ago, but
>>>> never heard back. I'm afraid the mailing list might no longer be
>>>> active and therefore I wanted to try this way. I apologize in advance
>>>> if there actually is a well-suited mailing list that I could have
>>>> addressed instead - if so, please tell me, I'd be happy to re-post my
>>>> question there. Otherwise, I would greatly appreciate any comments or
>>>> suggestions!
>>>>
>>>> Thank you in advance,
>>>> Martin Boßlet
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Martin Boßlet <
martin.bosslet@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: 2013/8/3
>>>> Subject: DSS and PAdES
>>>> To:
dss-dev@lists.oasis-open.org>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I am interested in best practices/guidelines for supporting PDF and,
>>>> more specifically, PAdES signatures using DSS. I found this message
>>>> [1] in the archives which pointed to the DSS-X TC. DSS-X introduced
>>>> the visible signature profile, which is a great addition with respect
>>>> to PDF signing using DSS, but as far as I understood the DSS-X TC has
>>>> not revised the abstract DSS Core profile in the sense that explicit
>>>> support for PDF/PAdES signatures would have been added.
>>>>
>>>> I was wondering if some publicly available guidelines or best
>>>> practices exist for using DSS in combination with PDF/PAdES
>>>> signatures? Are there any plans to augment the Core profile? While it
>>>> is certainly possible to use it already, explicit support would
>>>> probably foster interoperability between different solutions. Right
>>>> now, full PAdES support would probably require an additional concrete
>>>> profile, which currently would most likely be solution-specific.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks a lot in advance for your help and comments,
>>>> Martin Boßlet
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1]
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dss-dev/200707/msg00000.html>>>>
>>>
>