MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















xacml message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [xacml] [Issue] How many resourceIds in request context?




From: Satoshi Hada <SATOSHIH@jp.ibm.com>
To: "XACML" <xacml@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:08:44 +0900




>> It should not be required

I think it should be required to clarify
how to process a hierarchical resource and the "scope" attribute.

Satoshi Hada

IBM Tokyo Research Laboratory

mailto:satoshih@jp.ibm.com





"Daniel Engovatov"
<dengovatov@bea.com> 
2004/01/06 11:02




To
Satoshi Hada/Japan/IBM@IBMJP,
"XACML" <xacml@lists.oasis-open.org>


cc



Subject
RE: [xacml] [Issue] How many
resourceIds in request context?






Ouch.  This is bad.  This is real
bad.  I did not notice this sentence.  It should not be required.
  Will think on what interpretation I can suggest instead.
Daniel.


Also, Section 7.8 says that if the "scope" value is "Immediate"

or omitted, the request SHALL be interpreted to apply to

just the single resource specified by the "resource-id"

attribute.

I think this description implies that

there must be one and only one "resource-id" attribute

in any request context.









References:

RE: [xacml] [Issue] How many resourceIds in request context?
From: "Daniel Engovatov" <dengovatov@bea.com>






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]