MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->


















xacml message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [xacml] Brief summary of yesterday's focus group call




From: Frank Siebenlist <franks@mcs.anl.gov>
To: Bill Parducci <bparducci@gluecode.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 09:45:15 -0800






Hi Bill,

I would strongly suggest that you and other TC members do not reply to 
Tony's email.

For Tony to make such a bold statement without providing any explanation 
or constructive suggestions is considered childish, obnoxious and even 
unprofessional in my book, and doesn't deserve our attention.

Thanks, Frank.



Bill Parducci wrote:

> tony, could you please elaborate? i have been working with a few other 
> members of the TC to apply this concept to outstanding use access 
> control scenarios and the results to date are promising.
>
> thanks
>
> b
>
> Anthony Nadalin wrote:
>
>> Tim, I don't believe that the "generalization" draft fits within the 
>> charter of XACML.
>>
>> Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: xacml-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: xacml-help@lists.oasis-open.org
>

-- 
Frank Siebenlist               franks@mcs.anl.gov
The Globus Alliance - Argonne National Laboratory







Follow-Ups:

Re: [xacml] Brief summary of yesterday's focus group call
From: Michael McIntosh <mikemci@us.ibm.com>
Re: [xacml] Brief summary of yesterday's focus group call
From: Polar Humenn <polar@syr.edu>



References:

Re: [xacml] Brief summary of yesterday's focus group call
From: Anthony Nadalin <drsecure@us.ibm.com>
Re: [xacml] Brief summary of yesterday's focus group call
From: Bill Parducci <bparducci@gluecode.com>






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]