MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















xacml message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [Fwd: Re: [xacml] url/uri-string-concatenate]




From: "Daniel Engovatov" <dengovatov@bea.com>
To: "seth proctor" <Seth.Proctor@sun.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 22:45:13 -0700






Should we say that it may/should be implementation defined?  (I doubt it
would make sense to have it set per policy - but some folk love relative
uri..) - on the other hand it would be utterly useless for
interoperability, so I guess we should live it as is..
Daniel;
-----Original Message-----
From: seth proctor [mailto:Seth.Proctor@sun.com] 
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 1:48 PM
To: Daniel Engovatov
Cc: Ron Williams; Anne.Anderson@sun.com; OASIS XACML TC
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [xacml] url/uri-string-concatenate]


Daniel Engovatov wrote:
> Related question:
> 
> We do not support declaring base-uri property, do we?

No, we don't.


seth
_______________________________________________________________________
Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.






Follow-Ups:

Re: [Fwd: Re: [xacml] url/uri-string-concatenate]
From: Seth Proctor <Seth.Proctor@sun.com>








[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]