MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















xacml message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Inputs to rfc822Name-match




From: Tim Moses <tim.moses@entrust.com>
To: "'XACML'" <xacml@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 15:47:50 -0400






Colleagues - How do people feel about making both inputs to the
rfc822Name-match function of type rfc822Name (just as both inputs to the
x500Name-match function are of type x500Name)?

I am not certain whether all valid values for the first parameter to the
function are strictly names, as defined by RFC 822.  Nevertheless, I see
advantages in considering them legal values according to the
urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:2.0:data-type:rfc822Name definition.

Thoughts?

All the best.  Tim.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Tim Moses
613.270.3183






Follow-Ups:

Re: [xacml] Inputs to rfc822Name-match
From: Anne Anderson <Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM>








[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]