MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















xacml message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [xacml] New work item for obligations "fulfill" vs. "understand"?




From: Tim Moses <tim.moses@entrust.com>
To: "'Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM'" <Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM>,  "'XACML TC'" <xacml@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 12:17:18 -0500






Anne - Please do so.  I agree the wording is confusing.  All the best.  Tim.

-----Original Message-----
From: Anne Anderson [mailto:Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 11:32 AM
To: XACML TC
Cc: Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM
Subject: [xacml] New work item for obligations "fulfill" vs. "understand"?


The comment received on xacml-comment from "rgrzywinski@yahoo.com" mentions
that the handling of obligations is somewhat confused by the intermixed use
of the terms "fulfill" and "understand".

Shall I add a new work item to clarify this in the next revision?

Anne
-- 
Anne H. Anderson             Email: Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM
Sun Microsystems Laboratories
1 Network Drive,UBUR02-311     Tel: 781/442-0928
Burlington, MA 01803-0902 USA  Fax: 781/442-1692


To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the
OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xacml/members/leave_workgroup.p
hp.






Follow-Ups:

RE: [xacml] New work item for obligations "fulfill" vs. "understa	nd"?
From: Michiharu Kudoh <KUDO@jp.ibm.com>








[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]