Anil,
If the PEP sends incorrect attributes to the PDP, then it's the problem
of the PEP itself. The PDP does not care, and should not.
Regards,
Erik
Anil Tappetla (atappetl) wrote:
> Assuming the PEP uses digital signatures in SAML wrapped XACML (or for
> that matter SSL) as a means to authenticate with the PDP and to
> protect the integrity of the request, would it ever be a possible case
> where the attributes in the request have not been validated as
> legitimate by the PEP ? The signature only establishes the
> authenticity and integrity, but the requestor makes no claims about
> the validity of the attributes. In such cases, should not the PDP make
> these validations in order to circumvent a possible security attack ?
>
> Regards,
> Anil