OASIS eXtensible Access Control Markup Language (XACML) TC

 View Only

Re: [xacml] URI match function

  • 1.  Re: [xacml] URI match function

    Posted 06-10-2004 14:44
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    xacml message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: Re: [xacml] URI match function


    
    
    
    
    I am proposing that /a/b/* should not match /a/b/c/d that seems
    to be implied by Tim's text.
    I think /a/b/* should be wild card of /a/b/somenode e.g. /a/b/c
    and /a/b/d. "Somenode" should not be a structure that includes
    two or more nodes of child-parent relation like c/d.
    
    Best,
    Michiharu
    
    
    
                                                                               
                 Bill Parducci                                                 
                 <bill.parducci@ov                                             
                 erxeer.com>                                                To 
                                           xacml <xacml@lists.oasis-open.org>  
                 2004/06/10 22:57                                           cc 
                                                                               
                                                                       Subject 
                                           Re: [xacml] URI match function      
                                                                               
                                                                               
                                                                               
                                                                               
                                                                               
                                                                               
    
    
    
    
    just to make sure i understand, you are basically proposing that /a/b*
    would be
    used to match /a/b/ and not /a/b/* would not. is in other words, /* does
    not
    match / is this correct?
    
    b
    
    Michiharu Kudoh wrote:
    >
    >
    >
    > I have a question on url-match function proposed by Tim.
    > (I would prefer uri-match to url-match though)
    > According to his proposal, is the following correct?
    >
    > 1st arg           2nd arg           result
    > /a/b        /a/b        match
    > /a/b        /a          no match
    > /a/b/*            /a/b        no match
    > /a/b/*            /a/b/       match
    > /a/b/*            /a/b/c            match
    > /a/b/*            /a/b/c/d    match
    >
    > IMO, /a/b/* should match only to e.g. /a/b/c and /a/b/d.
    >
    > So I would like to propose another URI mapping that addresses
    > hierarchical structure.
    > For example, / matches any paths such as /a, /a/b.
    > /a matches any paths that starts with /a. So /a matches
    > /a, /a/b, /a/b/c, /a/d etc.
    > Since the path specified as the first argument always propagates
    > through the hierarchy, the function might be called as
    > "uri-match-with-propagation".
    >
    > Best
    > Michiharu
    
    To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
    the OASIS TC), go to
    http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xacml/members/leave_workgroup.php
    .
    
    
    
    


    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]