I think, multiple lists will be confusing, unless we track 'issues across
these lists' else where.
Sandilya
At 01:26 PM 5/23/2001, Hal Lockhart wrote:
>Our experience with multiple lists in SAML was mixed. Some people complained
>that the same issues got discussed on multiple lists leading to confusion
>and delay. SAML has now essentially merged the Assertions, Protocols and Use
>Case lists, while leaving the others separate.
>
>Hal
>
> >