MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















xacml message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [xacml] Generalization




From: Polar Humenn <polar@syr.edu>
To: Tim Moses <tim.moses@entrust.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 11:41:55 -0500 (EST)






On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Tim Moses wrote:

> Of course, this approach would cause us to make Obligations a mandatory part
> of the standard.  But, nothing in this approach infringes on IBM's patent.

Well, then, they really wouldn't be "obligations" as such, now would they?
:)






Follow-Ups:

Re: [xacml] Generalization
From: Anne Anderson <Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM>



References:

Generalization
From: Tim Moses <tim.moses@entrust.com>






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]