OASIS eXtensible Access Control Markup Language (XACML) TC

 View Only

RE: [xacml] urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:function:present

  • 1.  RE: [xacml] urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:function:present

    Posted 06-28-2004 15:15
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    xacml message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: RE: [xacml] urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:function:present


    Colleagues - If we are to retain the function "present", how about this as a
    definition?
    
    urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:function:present
    
    This function SHALL take one argument of data-type
    "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#anyURI"; and SHALL return a
    "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#boolean";.  The return value SHALL be
    "True" if there exists anywhere in the request context an attribute with an
    attributeId attribute whose value is the same as that of the function
    argument, according to the
    urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:function:anyURI-equal function.  Otherwise, it
    SHALL return "False".
    
    What do you think?
    
    All the best.  Tim.
    
    
    
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Polar Humenn [mailto:polar@syr.edu] 
    Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 8:34 AM
    To: Seth Proctor
    Cc: Tim Moses; 'XACML'
    Subject: Re: [xacml] urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:function:present
    
    
    
    I don't think we trashed that function. Did we? What was confusing about it?
    I don't recall. -Polar
    
    (won't make the confernce call today. I'm a the OMG meeting.
    
    -Polar
    
    On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Seth Proctor wrote:
    
    > On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 16:18, Tim Moses wrote:
    > > Colleagues - We list the function 
    > > "urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:function:present" as "mandatory" in 
    > > the conformance section.  But, I can't see a definition for it.  Can 
    > > anyone explain?  All the best.  Tim.
    >
    > Late into the 1.0 work there was a present function for determining if 
    > a value was present, but the semantics got too confused so we trashed 
    > it and instead created the MustBePresent attribute on Designators and 
    > Selectors. I suspect it's just a mistake that the attribute was left 
    > in. I suggest it should be removed.
    >
    >
    > seth
    >
    >
    > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster 
    > of the OASIS TC), go to 
    > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xacml/members/leave_workg
    > roup.php.
    >
    


    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]