MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















xacml message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [xacml] Type-is-in should be a match function




From: Seth Proctor <Seth.Proctor@Sun.COM>
To: Tim Moses <tim.moses@entrust.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 10:03:49 -0400







On Jul 22, 2004, at 9:28 AM, Tim Moses wrote:

> Seth - I notice that we are unclear in Section 5.8.  We say that legal
> values for the matchId attribute are documented in Section A.3.  Well, 
> all
> functions are documented in Section A.3.  So, am I right in saying that
> legal values for matchId are documented in Sections A.3.1 (equality
> predicates) and A.3.13 (special match functions)?  All the best.  Tim.

Tim and I just discussed this at the start of our conference call. The 
right thing to do is to reference section 7.5, where we list all the 
valid match functions. Everyone agree?


seth









References:

RE: [xacml] Type-is-in should be a match function
From: Tim Moses <tim.moses@entrust.com>






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]