I just found this document from 2007. Its out for review and comment: http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-95/SP800-95.pdf Once again we see the notion of "complicated" being attached to ebXML - when in fact the reverse can be the case! That ebXML contract and secure ebMS exchanges are better suited to much of what people want to do with SOA than a WSDL approach! Suggest we can produce a Top Reasons to Use ebXML for 2009 and submit this as feedback to NIST (similar to the format of this - http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/30366/EML-Top-Reasons.pdf) Happy 2009 Everyone! Thanks, DW
OASIS Open400 TradeCenter, Suite 5900Woburn, MA 01801USA
Phone+1 781 425 5073
Get Involved
Join an Open Project
Join a Technical Committee
About UsPrivacy