Dear TC members,
following is my view on the proposal from Florian - see
http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200703/msg00202.html -
considering the given requirements from Florian, Michael, Thomas and
myself:
ad F1:
I think the proposal in general meets this requirement.
But, I think there could be compatibility problems, because of the
proposed change to attribute text:continue-numbering. I my view the
ODF 1.0/1.1 specification is clear in this point and the change could
result, that applications following this change will continue the
numbering of a list, which isn't continued in an application following
ODF 1.0/1.1
ad F2 and F3:
I don't know, if the proposal meets these requirements, because I
don't know, what kind of "legacy" documents exists. I know ODF 1.0/1.1
documents created by OpenOffice.org, but I don't know documents
created by other applications.
As I already stated, I don't think that these requirements has to be
fulfilled.
ad F4:
I don't think, that the proposal meets this requirement - please see
below my example given for O10.
As I already stated, I think this requirement interprets the ODF
1.0/1.1 too strict. I would favor that the proposal has to fulfilled
the less strict requirement O10.
ad F5:
As I already stated, I don't know, if I understand this requirement
correct, because of the given examples.
Thus, my comment here can only be, that I don't, if the proposal meets
this requirement.
ad F6:
The proposal meets this requirement.
Comment to the proposal:
The samples for the list-override enhancement doesn't have to break
the list structure by new