OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC

 View Only

Updated JIRA target versions

  • 1.  Updated JIRA target versions

    Posted 02-03-2011 03:56
    I had an action item from last week's TC meeting to update the JIRA target versions. I've done that. Here's a quick summary of the relevant versions we have defined: ODF 1.2 CD 07 -- This is what we just approved as a CD and should be sending out for 15-day public review "any day now". ODF 1.2 CD 08 -- This is the target that we will use for any CD 07 defects found in the public review that we agree must be fixed before progressing to a Committee Specification ballot. It is quite likely that there will not be a CD 08, but I've added to JIRA "just in case". ODF-Next -- This currently holds unresolved member and public proposals that we are not including in ODF 1.2. ODF 1.2 Errata 01 -- This is the first errata document for ODF 1.2, which we should anticipate using to synch up ODF 1.2 with any corrections requested after the ISO review of ODF 1.2. ODF 1.1 Errata 01 -- This is the first errata document for ODF 1.1. This will be required to synch up the OASIS standard with ISO/IEC 26300/Amd.1. (Essentially we need to port forward corrections that have been made to ODF 1.0 via errata but not yet made to ODF 1.1) And the following are the anticipated four CDs for ODF 1.3. As we've been discussing, the goal is to have a new CSD every 6 months or so, with the first one tentatively set for the end of September: ODF 1.3 CSD 01 ODF 1.3 CSD 02 ODF 1.3 CSD 03 ODF 1.3 CSD 04 One recommended action for TC members is to grab any ODF-Next proposals that you wish to "own" and assign them to yourself as well as setting the "Fix for" field to a 1.3 CSD, ideally the first or second CSD. And if you have new proposal ideas that do not yet exist under ODF-Next, please enter them directly for one of the 1.3 CSD targets. Finally, we should agree on how we want to treat "unclaimed" ODF-Next proposals. A) Do we keep ODF-Next proposals in the "New" state indefinitely, and treat that as a bucket that we can dip into for ODF 1.x, 2.x, 3.x, etc.? B) Or do we close any items in remaining in ODF-Next (i.e., not claimed and moved to a 1.3 CSD target) once we reach a certain date? Regards, -Rob