OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC

 View Only
Expand all | Collapse all

Re: [office] comparing requirementsagainst Thomas'/David's/Oliver'sproposal

  • 1.  Re: [office] comparing requirementsagainst Thomas'/David's/Oliver'sproposal

    Posted 03-27-2007 10:14
    Hi Thomas,
    
    > Could you please drop that requirement?
    
    Sorry. I can't. I consider this to be essential. I don't want to have KOffice lists and OOo lists in ODF. I want to have
    one ODF list concept with two textual representations.
    
    This is what I want. However it's up to the TC to make a decision whether I'll get it ;-)
    
    ~Florian
    
    P.S.
    Someone once told me that numbered-paragraphs where introduced for WW interop. Is that true?
    
    
    >>> Thomas Zander 


  • 2.  Re: [office] comparing requirements =?iso-8859-1?q?against=09Thomas=27/David=27s/Oliver=27sproposal?=

    Posted 03-27-2007 10:22
    On Tuesday 27 March 2007 12:13, Florian Reuter wrote:
    > > Could you please drop that requirement?
    >
    > Sorry. I can't. I consider this to be essential. I don't want to have
    > KOffice lists and OOo lists in ODF. I want to have one ODF list concept
    > with two textual representations.
    >
    > This is what I want. However it's up to the TC to make a decision whether
    > I'll get it ;-)
    
    As I just stated in the mail you replied to, the TC has made a decision a long 
    time ago.
    So you are just repeating the question in hope that asking yet again will 
    alter the outcome? I don't think that's a very nice thing to do. Especially 
    as you stated that you will honor the decision the TC made. Which is thus 
    obviously not true.
    
    If the TC votes NO now; will you ask again in a year?
    -- 
    Thomas Zander