MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















office message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [office] Re: [office-accessibility] Re: [office] OpenDocument v1.1Committee Draft 1




From: Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM>
To: robert_weir@us.ibm.com
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:16:15 +0200






Robert,

robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote:
> 
> Actually, I am proposing a removing the content of Appendix E altogether 
> and have it be its own document, so it is all in one place, a coherent 
> whole.   If we have it in two places, what do we do when the content 
> overlaps?  It can get very confusing.

I don't expect that. Even if the guidelines are not normative, they should be 
stable.

> 
> Also, although Appendix E is said to be "non-normative", it has language 
> like "shall", "should" and "must" which contradicts that label.  So at 
> the very least I think we want to clean that up.

Appendix uses these terms, but they are not in bold, and therefore are part 
of the control language.

Michael






Follow-Ups:

Re: [office] Re: [office-accessibility] Re: [office] OpenDocumentv1.1 Committee Draft 1
From: Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net>



References:

Re: [office] Re: [office-accessibility] Re: [office] OpenDocument v1.1Committee Draft 1
From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]