OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC

 View Only

  • 1.  ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34 liaison statement

    Posted 10-09-2008 16:15 
    As you may know from a variety of sources, OASIS has received some 
suggestions from SC34 about the future maintenance of ODF as ISO/IEC 
26300.  This is primarily about institutional rules, not the 
substance of the specification.  We may choose to respond, are 
completing a (second internal) possible draft response, and of 
course will keep the TC advised.  Likely there will be more to talk 
about within a few days.

Kind regards Jamie

~ James Bryce Clark
~ Director of Standards Development, OASIS
~ http://www.oasis-open.org/who/staff.php#clark


  • 2.  Re: [odf-adoption] ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34 liaison statement

    Posted 10-09-2008 16:53 
    James,
Le 9 oct. 08 à 17:49, James Bryce Clark a écrit :

> As you may know from a variety of sources, OASIS has received some  
> suggestions from SC34 about the future maintenance of ODF as ISO/IEC  
> 26300.  This is primarily about institutional rules, not the  
> substance of the specification.  We may choose to respond, are  
> completing a (second internal) possible draft response, and of  
> course will keep the TC advised.  Likely there will be more to talk  
> about within a few days.

Besides deciding wether ODF should be maintained by the SC 34, which  
in my humble opinion is an unecessary option, I wonder what kind of  
suggestions we should be discussing with the SC 34?

Best Regards,

Charles-H. Schulz
Associé / Founding Partner,
Ars Aperta


  • 3.  Re: [odf-adoption] ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34 liaison statement

    Posted 10-09-2008 16:53 
    James,
Le 9 oct. 08 à 17:49, James Bryce Clark a écrit :

> As you may know from a variety of sources, OASIS has received some  
> suggestions from SC34 about the future maintenance of ODF as ISO/IEC  
> 26300.  This is primarily about institutional rules, not the  
> substance of the specification.  We may choose to respond, are  
> completing a (second internal) possible draft response, and of  
> course will keep the TC advised.  Likely there will be more to talk  
> about within a few days.

Besides deciding wether ODF should be maintained by the SC 34, which  
in my humble opinion is an unecessary option, I wonder what kind of  
suggestions we should be discussing with the SC 34?

Best Regards,

Charles-H. Schulz
Associé / Founding Partner,
Ars Aperta


Related Content