MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
office message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office] SPEC: wrong mimetype in example
On Monday 05 July 2004 15:14, Daniel Vogelheim wrote:
> Hmm, I'm surprised they have a media-type at all... Some inquiring
> presents: In OOo, if a directory has semantics of its own (such as a
> directory containing a sub-document), then it received a suitable media
> type (e.g. that for the sub-document-type). Other directories which are
> just there for administrative or convenience reason (such as Pictures/)
> have no media type, which is written as an empty attribute. I'm not sure
> if it would make sense to introduce a general-purpose directory media-type.
Why not completely omit such "administrative" directories from the manifest then?
The picture itself is referenced there anyway, I just wonder what's the point
in adding an entry for the directory itself. I propose removing manifest entries
for such 'administrative' directories as Pictures and Thumbnails.
--
David Faure, faure@kde.org, sponsored by Trolltech to work on KDE,
Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org).
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]