OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC

 View Only

RE: OpenDocument v1.0 (2nd edition) Comittee Specification

  • 1.  RE: OpenDocument v1.0 (2nd edition) Comittee Specification

    Posted 07-21-2006 14:34
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    office message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: RE: OpenDocument v1.0 (2nd edition) Comittee Specification


    Hi Michael,
    
      Probably using v1.0ed2 would be less confusing as a file name, but I don't see
    any reason for having to recreate and reupload.
    
    m   
    
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM [mailto:Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM] 
    > Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 10:24 AM
    > To: office@lists.oasis-open.org
    > Cc: 'James Bryce Clark'; Mary McRae
    > Subject: OpenDocument v1.0 (2nd edition) Comittee Specification
    > 
    > All,
    > 
    > the committee specification ballot for OpenDocument v1.0 (2nd 
    > edition) is closed now, and it is my understanding that 
    > OpenDocument v1.0 (end edition) has been approved as a 
    > committee specification.
    > 
    > I therefore have made the adaptions to the specification 
    > title pages and document identifiers. The OpenDocument v1.0 
    > (2nd edition) Committee Specification is now available in 
    > ODT, tagged PDF and HTML format at:
    > 
    > ODT:
    > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/19271/OpenDo
    > cument-v1.0-cs2.odt
    > 
    > tagged PDF:
    > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/19270/OpenDo
    > cument-v1.0-cs2.pdf
    > 
    > HTML (zipped):
    > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/19269/OpenDo
    > cument-v1.0-cs2.zip
    > 
    > I have chosen "cs2" within the identifier to reflect that 
    > this is the 2nd edition of OpenDocument v1.0. Mary, please 
    > let me know if you think another identifier would be more apropriate.
    > 
    > Best regards
    > 
    > Michael
    
    


    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]