OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC

 View Only

Re: [office] Proposed change to Monday's agenda (IRI's versus URI's)

  • 1.  Re: [office] Proposed change to Monday's agenda (IRI's versus URI's)

    Posted 01-20-2006 18:44
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    office message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: Re: [office] Proposed change to Monday's agenda (IRI's versus URI's)


    +1
    (Embedded image moved to file: pic13479.jpg)
    
    
                                                                               
                 Robert                                                        
                 Weir/Cambridge/IB                                             
                 M@Lotus                                                    To 
                                           office@lists.oasis-open.org         
                 01/20/06 12:02 PM                                          cc 
                                                                               
                                                                       Subject 
                                           [office] Proposed change to         
                                           Monday's agenda (IRI's versus       
                                           URI's)                              
                                                                               
                                                                               
                                                                               
                                                                               
                                                                               
                                                                               
    
    
    
    
    
    I've been handed some unofficial feedback from the Japanese standards body,
    indirectly forwarded to me via IBM's Japanese subsidiary.  It appears that
    ODF's use of URI's rather than the new unicode IRI's (
    http://www.w3.org/International/O-URL-and-ident.html) has been received
    poorly, and may result in an unfavorable ISO vote from Japan.
    
    They are also questioning ODF's use of CSS3 and DOM level 3 events, since
    neither were formally adopted by the W3C.  The suggestion was to define
    necessary portions of these specs in the ODF spec, rather than by
    reference.  (IMHO, this seems like more of an editorial comment than a
    technical one.)
    
    I'm asking that we agree to take on this issue on Monday's call as a
    priority issue.  The next meeting of their standards group will be before
    the end of the month, so there is some urgency for the TC to state if and
    how they will address this issue before then, which could turn around their
    vote.
    
    I'm no expert in this area, but it seems a possible fix would be to allow
    an IRI every place in the spec where a URI is currently specified.  Would
    this cause any other issues in the specification?  Any implementation
    issues?
    
    The tricky part might be where we reference an external specification which
    has not been updated to allow IRI's. (SVG?  SMIL?).  If there is any data
    which is essentially shared between legacy URI-based standards and newer
    IRI-aware standards, then we'll need to be careful how they interface.
    
    Do we agree that this IRI issue is a legitimate concern with ODF documents
    in Japan (and potentially China, Korea, etc.)?
    
    Can I get some +1's for adding this to the agenda for Monday?
    
    -Rob

    pic13479.jpg



    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]