OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC

 View Only

Re: [office] accessibility caption proposal comments

  • 1.  Re: [office] accessibility caption proposal comments

    Posted 06-22-2006 15:13
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    office message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: Re: [office] accessibility caption proposal comments


    Thanks Michael.

    content-id is fine.

    It looks like all text for a caption is wrapped in a text:sequence. I have only seen the use of draw:text-box in Open Office and Workplace implementations. Is this a spec. change and user agent implementation change or just a user agent implementation change?

    Cheers,
    Rich


    Rich Schwerdtfeger
    Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist
    Chair, IBM Accessibility Architecture Review Board
    blog: http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=441
    Inactive hide details for Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <<a href=Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM>">Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM>



    To

    Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS

    cc

    "Bruce D'Arcus" <bruce.darcus@OpenDocument.us>, office-accessibility@lists.oasis-open.org, OpenDocument <office@lists.oasis-open.org>

    Subject

    Re: [office] accessibility caption proposal comments

    Rich,

    what Bruce describes actually is what the TC agreed on Monday and what it
    already included in the 1.1 draft I'm currently editing.

    Does it work for you?

    Michael

    Bruce D'Arcus wrote On 06/22/06 14:39,:
    > Hi Rich,
    >
    > On Jun 22, 2006, at 8:34 AM, Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote:
    >
    >> I modified the caption proposal to replace the target id for
    >> describedby to be <draw:text-box> vs. <text:p>. The reason is that we
    >> discovered later that the caption can have multiple <text:p> per the
    >> schema and therefore the encapsulating text box should be the target id.
    >
    >
    > IIRC, Michael Brauer said you could wrap the paragraphs in a
    > text:section element as well. Am not sure which is better, but in any
    > case, the idea is that same.
    >
    >> Where is the TC at on the caption proposal. Has it agreed to use
    >> describedBy or are they wanting to do something more heavyweight like
    >> introducing a caption element?
    >
    >
    > We actually approved the attribute on Monday, although there was
    > consensus that caption-id is better because more specific. So 1.1 will
    > add a "caption-id" attribute per the original proposal.
    >
    > I guess this is unofficial until the minutes are posted and approved?
    >
    > Bruce
    >
    >
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
    > generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
    > OASIS
    > at:
    >
    https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

    --
    Michael Brauer                                Phone:  +49 40 23646 500
    Technical Architect Software Engineering      Fax:    +49 40 23646 550
    StarOffice Development
    Sun Microsystems GmbH
    Sachsenfeld 4
    D-20097 Hamburg, Germany                e-mail: michael.brauer@sun.com

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
    generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
    at:
    https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 


    GIF image



    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]