On 10/16/09 15:41, robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote:
> +1 for conducting the ballot. Since approving a CD and sending it out to
> public review both require a Full Majority Vote, we should be able to do
> this in a single ballot. But we will need some additional language in the
> ballot question.
>
> I think we have the main question as:
>
> "Shall the OASIS ODF TC approve ODF 1.2, Part III, Draft 12 as a Committee
> Draft and to send that Committee Draft out for a 60-day Public Review?"
Yes, that's correct.
>
> We then should also list the the URLs for the required 3 versions of the
> specification:
>
> Original Source:
> PDF:
> HTML
Yes, but I think that needs to be done when the ballot was successful.
>
> And also declare one of three versions of the specification be the
> authoritative document.
I suggest that this is the ODF version of the document.
>
> We also need a URL for the Schema files
For the ballot, we can include the zip file.
For the public review, they have to be available at a stable URI, and we
also have to adapt the URIs in the specification itself. But that is
also something I believe we can do when the ballot was successful.
>
> We are also asked, for the Public review, to recommend a list of "external
> stakeholders who should be notified of the review". I suggest we name:
> the ODF Interoperability and Conformance TC, the ODF Adoption TC,
> JTC1/SC34, the International Digital Publishing Forum. and the W3C's
> WebApp WG.
Agreed. We should add this to your suggestion above.
Best regards
Michael
>
> Regards,
>
> -Rob
>
>
>
> From:
> Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg