OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC

PS: How does this square with ODF 1.1 already having been submitted, as is,
from OASIS to JTC1.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamilton@acm.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 11:42
To: 'robert_weir@us.ibm.com'
Cc: 'Michael Brauer'; 'ODF TC List'; 'Patrick Durusau';
'Svante.Schubert@Sun.COM'
Subject: RE: [office] Re: OFFICE-2608 and Errata CD04 Defects

Rob,

Under that scenario, when does it become possible to prepare the amendment?
That is, what are the two inputs from which the amendment is derived?


-----Original Message-----
From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com [mailto:robert_weir@us.ibm.com] 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/201003/msg00421.html
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 10:06
To: dennis.hamilton@acm.org
Cc: Michael Brauer; ODF TC List; Patrick Durusau; Svante.Schubert@Sun.COM
Subject: [office] Re: OFFICE-2608 and Errata CD04 Defects

[ ... ]

1) ISO/IEC 26300 + COR1 + COR2 will satisfy all outstanding defect reports 
against ODF 1.0.  We process them as both Errata and Corrigenda.

2)We adopt the same changes, where applicable, to OASIS ODF 1.1.  Some 
changes will not be needed, since they are already fixed in ODF 1.1.  But 
the remaining fixes become Approved Errata for ODF 1.1

3) The delta between the corrected OASIS ODF 1.1 and the corrected ISO/IEC 
26300 becomes the amendment.

Note that we might want to keep the errata for ODF 1.1 open until the ODF 
1.0 amendment completes its ballot in SC34.  Then if we do need to make 
any additional non substantive fixes we can place such fixes in the errata 
as well.  So in practice steps 2 and 3 overlap.

Regards,

-Rob

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 

"Dennis E. Hamilton" 

Good, I forgot about the reconciliation approach from the older discussions.

Is it good enough for the FPDAM to be prepared against IS 26300:2006 as it
is now, before the DCORi are finalized, and sync it all in the
reconciliation?

 - Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com [mailto:robert_weir@us.ibm.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 12:44
To: dennis.hamilton@acm.org
Cc: 'Michael Brauer'; 'ODF TC List'; 'Patrick Durusau';
Svante.Schubert@Sun.COM
Subject: RE: [office] Re: OFFICE-2608 and Errata CD04 Defects

"Dennis E. Hamilton" 

"Dennis E. Hamilton" 

I checked the comparison of the COR1/Errata01 changes made to ODF 1.1 and
the diff that Patrick prepared between 1.1 and IS 26300.

There are only 4 collisions that have to be watched for.  I think we might
as well do (A) for now and adjust manually for (B).  These are the
(potential) collisions to watch out for:

 1. Section 9.3.11 sub-section Common Image Map Attributes and Elements.
There is an Errata01/COR1 change *nearby* but an amendment done as change
marking can be structured to miss that.

 2. Section 15.27.22 Errata01/COR1 change to style:wrap-dynamic-threshold
(not -treshold) in the schema fragment has already been changed in 1.1 and
it looks like a delta from IS 26300:2006.

 3. Section 16.1 Datatypes under custom data types has an errata change to
-length and there are different changes (in other parts of the same text)
made in 1.1 in contrast to IS 26300:2006.

 4. Appendix B Errata01/COR1 change to [DOMEvents] appears to be clobbered
by [DOMEvents2] and [DOMEvents3] in ODF 1.1.

 - Dennis

PS: If there is to be a full-up amended IS 26300 document produced, I think
it should not be until the very end when the amendment and the two
Corrigenda are applied, with 1.1 and IS 26300:2006/fixed-up all assured to
be in synch.

-----Original Message-----
From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com [mailto:robert_weir@us.ibm.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 16:39
To: dennis.hamilton@acm.org
Cc: 'Michael Brauer'; 'ODF TC List'; 'Patrick Durusau';
Svante.Schubert@Sun.COM
Subject: RE: [office] Re: OFFICE-2608 and Errata CD04 Defects

"Dennis E. Hamilton"