MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
office message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-accessibility] Requested editorial change to Appendix E inthe ODF 1.1 specification
Mary,
Mary McRae wrote:
> Ah, I shouldn't read my email in reverse order ;-)
>
> Ok, I will go ahead and get the announcement out this afternoon. Yes, it's
> perfectly reasonable for this change request to be submitted as part of the
> public review process and later incorporated in the spec without requiring a
> further public review.
Thank you very much for starting the public review.
Michael
>
> Regards,
>
> Mary
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Peter.Korn@Sun.COM [mailto:Peter.Korn@Sun.COM]
>>Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 12:15 PM
>>To: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org
>>Cc: 'Richard Schwerdtfeger'; Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM;
>>office-accessibility@lists.oasis-open.org;
>>office@lists.oasis-open.org; 'Robert Weir'; mayue@cn.ibm.com
>>Subject: Re: [office-accessibility] Requested editorial
>>change to Appendix E in the ODF 1.1 specification
>>
>>Hi Mary,
>>
>>The change we would like to make is a small clarification
>>change in the non-normative portion of the document - Appendix E.
>>
>>Separately from Michael (who I believe has left work for the day in
>>Germany) I understand that if the document doesn't go out
>>today, we miss our timeline.
>>
>>I believe this change can be made within the 60 day public
>>review (as an editorial change, especially as it is non-normative).
>>
>>So, I suggest you do NOT delay, but go ahead with PR this afternoon.
>>
>>Rich - is this acceptable to you?
>>
>>
>>Peter
>>
>>>I was about to announce the PR this afternoon ... Michael,
>>
>>let me know
>>
>>>if I should hold up or if you'd instead like this handled
>>
>>as a comment
>>
>>>submitted during the public review to be incorporated prior
>>
>>to CS vote.
>>
>>>
>>>Mary
>>>
>>>
>>
>>--------------------------------------------------------------
>>----------
>>
>>> *From:* Richard Schwerdtfeger [mailto:schwer@us.ibm.com]
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, July 27, 2006 11:27 AM
>>> *To:* Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM
>>> *Cc:* office-accessibility@lists.oasis-open.org;
>>> office@lists.oasis-open.org; Robert Weir; Peter.Korn@Sun.COM;
>>> mayue@cn.ibm.com
>>> *Subject:* [office-accessibility] Requested editorial change to
>>> Appendix E in the ODF 1.1 specification
>>>
>>> Michael,
>>>
>>> The ODF Accessibility Subcommittee would like to make
>>
>>an editorial
>>
>>> change to the non-normative Appendix E.3 of the ODF 1.1
>>> specification.
>>>
>>> Change:
>>>
>>> Users importing non-OpenDocument slides that contain tables need
>>> access to the table structure via their assistive technology.
>>> Therefore tables imported into OpenDocument from another file
>>> format must have their structure preserved, and should
>>
>>be imported
>>
>>> as embedded spreadsheets.
>>>
>>> to:
>>>
>>> Users importing non-OpenDocument slides that contain tables need
>>> access to the table structure via their assistive technology.
>>> Therefore tables imported into an OpenDocument application from
>>> another file format must have their structure
>>
>>preserved, and when
>>
>>> saved as ODF should be saved as embedded spreadsheets.
>>>
>>> The way this was previously worded was ambiguous in that Open
>>> Document applications may import powerpoint slides natively and
>>> saying that you would need to convert the document to
>>
>>an embedded
>>
>>> spreadsheet for a powerpoint slide would be
>>
>>incorrect.and we would
>>
>>> like to see this changed.
>>>
>>> We would like to have this appear in the ODF 1.1 specification
>>> going out for public review next week however we do not
>>
>>want this
>>
>>> to hold up the 60 day review. If this cannot be done in time for
>>> the review then we will add this as part of the review comments.
>>>
>>> Rich
>>>
>>>
>>> Rich Schwerdtfeger
>>> Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist
>>> Chair, IBM Accessibility Architecture Review Board
>>> blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/schwer
>>>
>>
>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]