OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC

 View Only
  • 1.  Namespace question

    Posted 02-16-2021 22:43
    Hello all, I’m probably misunderstanding things, but was still wondering:   Table 6 in section 1.5 Namespaces mentions "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.2"   But   D.3) in section 2.2.1 OpenDocument Document has this: D.3) If a style:condition, table:condition, table:_expression_, table:formula or text:formula attribute value begins with a namespace prefix bound to namespace "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.3," the syntax and semantics of the attribute value portions that are expressions determined by the prefix shall conform to Part4 of this specification. If a style:condition, table:condition, table:_expression_, table:formula or text:formula attribute value has no namespace prefix, the attribute value portions that are expressions determined by a prefix shall conform as if there were a prefix bound to namespace "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.3".   And it looks like LO writes out "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.2" in styles.xml   Should “urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.3” in D.3) in section 2.2.1 really be "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.2"?   Thanks Alfred


  • 2.  RE: [office] Namespace question

    Posted 02-17-2021 00:02
    The two instances of "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.3" in section 2.2.1 D.3 are clearly typos. They appear to have been introduced in WD13 of Part 3 Schema in December 2018. Patrick and I were working through a whole load of editorial fixes at that time, and I’ve found a note that I initially suggested changing ‘1.2’ to ‘1.3’, but then queried whether this was the right thing to do. Clearly the change was made and wasn’t reviewed or spotted subsequently.   One for ODF 1.3 Errata, I fear.   Francis       From: office@lists.oasis-open.org <office@lists.oasis-open.org> On Behalf Of Alfred Hellstern Sent: 16 February 2021 22:43 To: office@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [office] Namespace question   Hello all, I’m probably misunderstanding things, but was still wondering:   Table 6 in section 1.5 Namespaces mentions "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.2"   But   D.3) in section 2.2.1 OpenDocument Document has this: D.3) If a style:condition, table:condition, table:_expression_, table:formula or text:formula attribute value begins with a namespace prefix bound to namespace "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.3," the syntax and semantics of the attribute value portions that are expressions determined by the prefix shall conform to Part4 of this specification. If a style:condition, table:condition, table:_expression_, table:formula or text:formula attribute value has no namespace prefix, the attribute value portions that are expressions determined by a prefix shall conform as if there were a prefix bound to namespace "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.3".   And it looks like LO writes out "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.2" in styles.xml   Should “urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.3” in D.3) in section 2.2.1 really be "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.2"?   Thanks Alfred


  • 3.  Re: [office] Namespace question

    Posted 02-18-2021 17:04
    I have discussed a potential best practice shortly with Regina and added this editorial issue to our editorial typo-collection issue: https://github.com/oasis-tcs/odf-tc/issues/35#issuecomment-781489556 In addition, I have the labels "editorial", "ODF 1.3" and "ODF 1.4" as the typos should be mentioned in a "known-issue" document for ODF 1.3 and be fixed in the upcoming ODF 1.4 specification as well. For this reason, I have added two checkboxes on every comment: One for ODF 1.3 and one for ODF 1.4 Best regards, Svante Am Mi., 17. Feb. 2021 um 01:01 Uhr schrieb Francis Cave < francis@franciscave.com >: The two instances of "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.3" in section 2.2.1 D.3 are clearly typos. They appear to have been introduced in WD13 of Part 3 Schema in December 2018. Patrick and I were working through a whole load of editorial fixes at that time, and I ve found a note that I initially suggested changing 1.2 to 1.3 , but then queried whether this was the right thing to do. Clearly the change was made and wasn t reviewed or spotted subsequently. One for ODF 1.3 Errata, I fear. Francis From: office@lists.oasis-open.org < office@lists.oasis-open.org > On Behalf Of Alfred Hellstern Sent: 16 February 2021 22:43 To: office@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [office] Namespace question Hello all, I m probably misunderstanding things, but was still wondering: Table 6 in section 1.5 Namespaces mentions "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.2" But D.3) in section 2.2.1 OpenDocument Document has this: D.3) If a style:condition, table:condition, table:_expression_, table:formula or text:formula attribute value begins with a namespace prefix bound to namespace "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.3," the syntax and semantics of the attribute value portions that are expressions determined by the prefix shall conform to Part4 of this specification. If a style:condition, table:condition, table:_expression_, table:formula or text:formula attribute value has no namespace prefix, the attribute value portions that are expressions determined by a prefix shall conform as if there were a prefix bound to namespace "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.3". And it looks like LO writes out "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.2" in styles.xml Should urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.3 in D.3) in section 2.2.1 really be "urn:oasis:names:tc:opendocument:xmlns:of:1.2"? Thanks Alfred