"Dennis E. Hamilton" <
dennis.hamilton@acm.org> wrote on 06/02/2012 06:17:47 PM: > From: "Dennis E. Hamilton" <
dennis.hamilton@acm.org> > To: <
office@lists.oasis-open.org>, > Cc: <
robert_weir@us.ibm.com> > Date: 06/02/2012 06:18 PM > Subject: RE: [office] Groups - ODF 1.1 Errata 01 WD04 (PDF) uploaded > > Rob, > > I anticipate two more Working Drafts, WD05 before the end of June > and WD06 before the end of July. > > I have provided more information in > <
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/201205/msg00026.html >. > > There is also the possibility of crowd-sourcing the verification of > the main Errata items (in Section 2 of the 1.1 Errata 01 WD) as may > happen in WG6 as well: > <
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/201205/msg00027.html >. > > With regard to focused attention of the ODF TC, I think the next > steps will be when I have identified all of the previously- > unresolved JIRA issues that reflect additional defects in ODF 1.1 > that were discovered in the AMD creation process and subsequently. > Dennis, my understanding was that we were only making the changes to ODF 1.1 necessary to synch up with ISO/IEC 26300 + Cor 1+ Cor 2. + Amd 1. If there were any other defects found in ODF 1.1 (and I am sure there are) that exist in the ISO version as well, we could consider them in a subsequent errata/COR. But this particular errata was purely to synch with the ISO version. Is that what you are thinking as well? -Rob > I will have a compilation of these for review and processing by the > ODF TC sometime time in the WD05-WD06 availability period. > > The requirement for ODF TC action will be agreement on the > additional JIRA issues and the corresponding Errata items and then > on the approval of WD06 (or later) as a CSD01 that would then > receive 15-day public review as a draft Errata. > > - Dennis > > -----Original Message----- > From:
office@lists.oasis-open.org [ mailto:
office@lists.oasis-open.org > ] On Behalf Of
robert_weir@us.ibm.com > Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 17:17 > To: Dennis Hamilton > Cc:
office@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [office] Groups - ODF 1.1 Errata 01 WD04 (PDF) uploaded > > Hi Dennis, > > I see that you have been busy. Did you receive any feedback on the > latest WD? What more do want to happen before it is ready for a > Public Review? > > -Rob > > > <
office@lists.oasis-open.org> wrote on 05/21/2012 01:51:08 AM: > > > From: Dennis Hamilton <
dennis.hamilton@acm.org> > > To:
office@lists.oasis-open.org, > > Date: 05/21/2012 01:52 AM > > Subject: [office] Groups - ODF 1.1 Errata 01 WD04 (PDF) uploaded > > Sent by: <
office@lists.oasis-open.org> > > > > Submitter's message > > This is a PDF of the ODT of the same name. Some may find it more > > convenient for use in review. > > -- Mr. Dennis Hamilton > > > > Document Name: ODF 1.1 Errata 01 WD04 (PDF) > > Description > > From the document properties description: > > > > ODF 1.1 Errata 01 is designed to provide alignment with ODF 1.0 Errata 01, > > ODF 1.0 Errata 02, IS 26300:2006 COR1, COR2, and AMD1. > > > > Working Draft 04 contains the Errata items that align ODF 1.1 with IS > > 26300:2006/COR1 (ODF 1.0 Errata 01), COR2 (ODF 1.0 Errata 02) and those > > change in IS 26300:2006/AMD1 that did not originate in ODF 1.0 Errata. > > Although much of the editorial content remains to be completed, the changes > > in Section 2 are suitable for review and verification. > > OpenDocument-v1.1-Mocked-Errata-wd04-2012-05-18-1517.odt is the > > accompanying WD04 modification of the ODF 1.1 specification with mock > > application of tracked-changes. That document may be helpful in review and > > verification of completeness and accuracy of the changes. > > > > The only other changes that may occur in Section 2 are completion of > > references to corresponding issues and addition of post-AMD1 issues that > > are identified for ODF 1.1. > > Download Latest Revision > > Public Download Link > > Submitter: Mr. Dennis Hamilton > > Group: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC > > Folder: Miscellaneous > > Date submitted: 2012-05-20 22:51:03 > > Revision: 5 > >