Hi Dave,
On Thursday, 2006-12-14 07:58:17 +0000, Dave Pawson wrote:
> >Can this be extended to RFC 4646/bis? If it can't, we need some other
> >means for the default document language.
>
> And surely this should be a match for the sections 15.4.23 and 15.4.24
> which
> specify the fo:language and fo:country attributes for
> style-text-properties-attlist?
Sure, and the other places I mentioned in
Message-id: <20061128131659.GI64018@sr1-eham02-03.Germany.Sun.COM>
> If backwards compatibility is a permanent issue it is going
> to negatively impact development.
Well, here it would only affect backwards compatibility in cases where
the document language wouldn't be known or not be expected by the
reading application, so it would be read broken anyway.
> I'd support rfc4646 use for both.
> Anyone know what the Dublin Core group are going with dc:language?
Would be nice to know indeed.
Eike
--
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS