OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC

 View Only
  • 1.  Re: [office] Normative examples for ODF1.1

    Posted 03-12-2007 14:37
    Hi Oliver,
    
    but when you define "text:continue-numbering" as beeing "false" then
    
    
    will result in
    1. A
    1. B
    
    right? Since this isn't right the only conclusion if that the default is "true".
    
    ---
    
    > This sample isn't valid ODF 1.1, because style:list-style-name="" isn't 
    > possible in ODF 1.1
    
    Now I disagree :-) The ODF1.1. spec clearly states
    
    
    This means that style:list-style-name="" is possible.
    
    ---
    
    Regarding the posting from Thomas (http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200703/msg00063.html) I have a different
    understanding. As said in my world "counters are directly linked to list definitions". So we have to select one or the
    other interpretation.
    
    ---
    
    Thanks so much for the input. Attached are the updated samples according to your concerns I agree on :-)
    
    Btw. to we have a clear understanding of a "Default Style"?
    
    ~Florian
    
    
    
    >>> Oliver-Rainer Wittmann - Software Engineer - Sun Microsystems 


  • 2.  Re: [office] Normative examples for ODF1.1

    Posted 03-12-2007 14:46
    Florian Reuter wrote:
    
    > ...
    >> This sample isn't valid ODF 1.1, because style:list-style-name="" isn't 
    >> possible in ODF 1.1
    > 
    > Now I disagree :-) The ODF1.1. spec clearly states
    > 
    
    Oh, sorry for the confustion. I mixed this attribute with another one.
    
    Regards, Oliver.
    


  • 3.  Re: [office] Normative examples for ODF1.1

    Posted 03-12-2007 14:56
    Florian Reuter wrote:
    > Hi Oliver,
    > 
    > but when you define "text:continue-numbering" as beeing "false" then
    > 
    > 
    > will result in
    > 1. A
    > 1. B
    > 
    > right? Since this isn't right the only conclusion if that the default is "true".
    > 
    No, the given result isn't the only correct interpretation in ODF 1.1
    
    And again, I've to repeat the following statement:
    ODF 1.1 specification doesn't specify, how numbered paragraphs form a 
    certain list and thus, how a counter domain is formed for numbered 
    paragraphs.
    Thus, it's not clear, if the both above given numbered paragraphs form 
    *one* list or *two* list.
    
    Regards, Oliver.
    
    > ...