OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC

 View Only

Re: [office] A few of specific examples]

  • 1.  Re: [office] A few of specific examples]

    Posted 02-04-2009 02:44
    Rob,
    
    We already allow arbitrary extension by foreign elements and attributes 
    and you offer no examples of actual "evil" use of them with ODF.
    
    Moreover, careful readers will note that ODF 1.2 allows *arbitrary* 
    extension by its new metadata mechanism.
    
    Why? Well, because no standards committee, not even ours, can anticipate 
    every need of every user. So from the very beginning ODF has allowed 
    several mechanisms for arbitrary extension of the defined markup.
    
    Florian on our last call, had a good use case for older ODF applications 
    to process later ODF documents, whose new elements and atttibutes are 
    "foreign" to them.
    
    BTW, ODF and markup technologies are *not* religious issues and so 
    differences in markup choices are not "evil." I already have a religion, 
    one that has existed a good bit longer than markup technologies and I am 
    not in the market for a new one. I think it would help if we all simply 
    try to do the best jobs we can and not view markup, including ODF, 
    through lens of good versus evil.
    
    Granted I have labored over ODF for years, both as a volunteer and more 
    recently as a paid editor and I prefer its choices over other possible 
    choices. That's understandable. What I refuse to do is to brand other 
    choices as "evil" or somehow beyond the pale. If our choices are the 
    better ones, and I certainly think they are, then we should be able to 
    demonstrate that to others. Note I said demonstrate, not simply shout it 
    at others. There is a difference.
    
    And yes, yes, others may refuse to listen or persist in disagreeing. 
    That is certainly their privilege. As I have pointed out in another 
    context, listening should not be equated with agreement. I can listen 
    quite attentively and still disagree in a civil manner.
    
    Hope you are having a great day!
    
    Patrick
    
    robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote:
    > Some specific examples of how and why arbitrary proprietary extensions 
    > are evil.
    >
    > Two common concerns with users is the need for privacy and security.  
    > The issue of personally-identifying meta-data is increasingly in the 
    > news. Some products, like Microsoft Office, have a built-in operation 
    > that will remove such information from a Word document.  There are 
    > also third-party application that will strip such metadata from a 
    > document.
    >
    > So, suppose you want to write such an operation for an ODF document.. 
    > What do you do?  Simple enough, look to meta.xml scrub extension 
    > elements under