OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC

 View Only

Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) v1.1 Submitted for OASIS Standard

  • 1.  Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) v1.1 Submitted for OASIS Standard

    Posted 01-03-2007 02:43
    OASIS Members:
    
    The OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) Technical
    Committee has submitted the following specification set, which is an approved
    Committee Specification, to be considered as an OASIS Standard:
    
    Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) Specification v1.1
    
    The text of the TC submission is appended.
    
    You now have until 15 January to familiarize yourself with the submission and
    provide input to your organization's voting representative.
    
    On 16 January, a Call For Vote will be issued to all Voting Representatives of
    OASIS member organizations. They will have until the last day of January,
    inclusive, to cast their ballots on whether this Committee Specification should
    be approved as an OASIS Standard or not.
    
    Members who wish to discuss this ballot may do so through
    member-discuss@lists.oasis-open.org.
    
    In accordance with the OASIS Technical Committee Process, this Committee
    Specification has already completed the necessary 60-day public review period as
    noted in the submission below.
    
    The normative TC Process for approval of Committee Specifications as OASIS
    Standards is found at
    http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#3.4
    
    Any statements related to the IPR of this specification are posted at:
    http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/office/ipr.php
    
    Your participation in the review and balloting process is greatly appreciated.
    
    Mary
    
    Mary P McRae
    Manager of TC Administration, OASIS
    email: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org
    phone: 603.232.9090
    
    -----------------------
    
    The following items are hereby submitted pursuant to the OASIS
    requirements:
    
    (a)Links to the approved Committee Specification in the TC's document
    repository:
    
        The OpenDocument v1.1 specification is available in
    
        1.OpenDocument format:
     
    http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/20848/OpenDocument-v1.1-cs1.od
    t
    
        2.PDF format:
     
    http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/20847/OpenDocument-v1.1-cs1.pd
    f
    
        3.XHTML format: (zipped):
     
    http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/20846/OpenDocument-v1.1-cs1_ht
    ml.zip
    
        The three schemas defined by the OpenDocument v1.1 specification are also
        available separately:
    
        1.OpenDocument v1.1 Relax-NG Schema (extracted from chapter 1 to 16 of the
          specification):
     
    http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/20845/OpenDocument-schema-v1.1
    -cs1.rng
    
        2.OpenDocument v1.1 Manifest Relax-NG Schema (extracted from chapter 17 of
    the
          specification):
    http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/20843/OpenDocument-manifest-sc
    hema-v1.1-cs1.rng
    
        3.OpenDocument v1.1 Strict Relax-NG Schema (extracted from appendix A of the
          specification):
    http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/20844/OpenDocument-strict-sche
    ma-v1.1-cs1.rng
    
    (b)The editable version of all files that are part of the Committee
    Specification:
    
        The editable version of the specification is the version in OpenDocument
    format
        listed above.
    
    (c)Certification by the TC that all schema and XML instances included in the
        specification, whether by inclusion or reference, including fragments of
    such,
        are well formed, and that all expressions are valid;
    
        The contained schemas have been extensively tested, and the specification
        document itself was validated against the contained schema. Sample instance
        fragments and expressions were reviewed.
    
    (d)A clear English-language summary of the specification
    
        The OpenDocument specification defines an XML schema for office applications
        and its semantics. The schema is suitable for office documents, including
    text
        documents, spreadsheets, charts and graphical documents like drawings or
        presentations, but is not restricted to these kinds of documents.
    
        The schema provides for high-level information suitable for editing
    documents.
        It defines suitable XML structures for office documents and is friendly to
        transformations using XSLT or similar XML-based tools.
    
        The OpenDocument v1.1 specification is a minor update to the OpenDocument
    v1.0
        OASIS Standard. Compared to the OpenDocument v1.0 specification, the
        OpenDocument v1.1 specification contains a couple of accessibility-related
        enhancements, error corrections and clarifications, and very few other minor
        enhancements.
    
    (e)A statement regarding the relationship of this specification to similar work
    of
        other OASIS TCs or other standards developing organizations;
    
        OpenDocument v1.1 supersedes an existing OASIS Standard, OpenDocument v1.0.
    
    (f)Certification by at least three OASIS member organizations that they are
        successfully using the specification;
    
        1.IBM:
          http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200611/msg00004.html
    
        2.Novell:
          http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200612/msg00026.html
    
        3.OpenDocument Foundation:
          http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200611/msg00003.html
    
        4.Royal National Institute for the Blind
          http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200611/msg00056.html
    
        5.Sun:
          http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200612/msg00001.html
    
    (g)The beginning and ending dates of the public review(s), a pointer to the
        announcement of the public review(s), and a pointer to an account of each of
        the comments/issues raised during the public review period(s), along with
    its
        resolution;
    
        The public review started 27 July 2006, and ended 25 September 2006.
    
        The public review was announced on 27 July 2006:
          http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/members/200607/msg00015.html
    
        A list of comments/issues raised during the public review, along with their
        resolution, is available at:
     
    http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/20685/OpenDocument-v1.1-commen
    ts.odt
    
    (h)An account of and results of the voting to approve the specification as a
        Committee Specification, including the date of the ballot and a pointer to
    the
        ballot;
    
        The specification was approved as a Committee Specification at 19 October
    2006.
        The ballot result is available at:
        http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/office/ballot.php?id=1129
    
    (i)An account of or pointer to votes and comments received in any earlier
    attempts
        to standardize substantially the same specification, together with the
        originating TC's response to each comment;
    
        No earlier attempt to standardize the same specification was made.
    
    (j)A pointer to the publicly visible comments archive for the originating TC;
    
        The TC's comment archive is at:
        http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/
    
    (k)A pointer to any minority reports submitted by one or more Members who did
    not
        vote in favor of approving the Committee Specification, which report may
        include statements regarding why the member voted against the specification
    or
        that the member believes that Substantive Changes were made which have not
    gone
        through public review; or certification by the Chair that no minority
    reports
        exist.
    
        The specification was approved unanimously as a Committee Specification.
        Therefore, no minority report exists.