On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 18:27 -0600, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> If it is confirmed that an issue resolution was actually carried out, it
> should be moved from "resolved" to "applied."
Yes of course. (And while I appear to have missed the odd one, most were
immediately moved via resolved-fixed to applied.)
> The way we use "resolved by
> fixed" on the ODF TC doesn't tell us enough.
>
> With regard to your updates, I guess I will simply have to wait until I
> uncover them in my Issues folder (766 unread) along with the torrent that
> has been pouring in, since I don't know which specific issues those are.
I am not quite sure what you are trying to imply here. Was I supposed to
list them somewhere special?
If you search for "already fixed in ODF1.0 Errata CD5" in a comment with
a status of Applied you should be able to find most of them.
Andreas
>
> Later, ...
>
> - Dennis
>
>
Original Message-----
> From: Andreas J. Guelzow [mailto:andreas.guelzow@concordia.ab.ca]
> Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 14:35
> To: dennis.hamilton@acm.org
> Cc: office@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [office] JIRA issues targeted for released versions
>
> On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 15:02 -0600, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> > We need to figure out which of these have actually been resolved and
> applied
> > rather than retarget them. Some of these may also be wandering because
> > there was no suitable target at the time. We need to look.
>
> Yes and I did. Yo may have noticed that most of them were closed as
> fixed (in which case I added the fix from Errata CD05 as resolution) and
> a few were retargetted. When they were partially fixed I spelled out
> what was missed.
>
> Andreas
>
>
> >
> >
Original Message-----
> > From: Andreas J. Guelzow [mailto:andreas.guelzow@concordia.ab.ca]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 14:12
> > To: office@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: [office] JIRA issues targeted for released versions
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > on http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE
> > we have a listing of open issues by targetted version.
> > this includes
> > 19 issues targeted for ODF1.0 errata 1
> > 6 issues targeted for ODF1.0 errata 2
> > 1 issue targeted for ODF1.0 errata CD 5
> >
> > since we already approved these versions, should this be retargeted to
> > ODF1.0 errata 3 (already 10 issues) or ODF1.0 errata CD 6 (already 8
> > issues)?
> >
> > [ ... ]
> >
>
>