OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC

 View Only

Re: [office] Style properties questions/requests

  • 1.  Re: [office] Style properties questions/requests

    Posted 08-18-2003 13:27
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    office message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: Re: [office] Style properties questions/requests


    Hi Paul,
    
    Paul Grosso wrote:
    > At 17:33 2003 08 15 +0200, David Faure wrote:
    > 
    >>On Friday 15 August 2003 15:30, Michael Brauer wrote:
    >>
    >>>Hi David,
    >>>
    >>>David Faure wrote:
    >>>
    >>>>Text properties:
    >>>>
    >>>>style:text-crossing-out (3.10.6) doesn't have support for stylelines (solid, dash, dot, dashdot, dashdotdot)
    >>>>KOffice supports crossing out text with various style of lines.
    >>>>
    >>>>style:text-underline (3.10.22) should separate the number of lines (single/double) from the style of the lines (dotted etc.).
    >>>>This allows more combinations, like double-dotted, etc.
    >>>>The presence of all the bold-* values also suggests that bold should be separated.
    >>>
    > 
    > If we are going to redesign this, we might want to look at XSL and 
    > CSS properties and try to match them where feasible.
    > 
    > For example, see http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/slice7.html#text-decoration
    > and http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/text.html#propdef-text-decoration
    
    The CSS2 text-decoration is not usable with office suite style 
    inheritance, because it does not support switching underlining off 
    without switching crossing-out and blinking off simultaneously. This has 
    been fixed in XSL-FO, but XSL-FO does not support different styles for 
    underlining and crossing-out.
    
    > 
    > There is also http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-text/#text-decoration-overview
    > which is more involved (which may be good or bad, depending on how you
    > look at it).
    
    The CSS3 specification seems to be a good basis for us. Only a set of 
    line styles are missing.
    
    > 
    > paul
    > 
    
    Best regards
    
    Michael
    
    


    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]