OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC

Hi,

for me the result it not so clear. Michael was refering to the HTML lists. However HTML lists simple can't numbering like 1., 1.1, 1.2, .... So the behaviour at this point is undefined.

In fact my intuitive result would be
1.
1.i.
1.ii.

Regarding your answer at 2007-01-22. That was for :

Hi Florian,

why do you changed your mind?

In your reply to my suggestion at 2007-01-22, which was corrected by 
Michael, you suggested the same as I, on which Micheal and David agreed on.

your reply from 2007-01-22:

Wow --- thats interresting.

Let's assume the lists will restart, then I would expect:
1.
1.A.
A.i.
i.a.



Regards, Oliver.

Florian Reuter wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> for me the result it not so clear. Michael was refering to the HTML lists. However HTML lists simple can't numbering like 1., 1.1, 1.2, .... So the behaviour at this point is undefined.
> 
> In fact my intuitive result would be
> 1.
> 1.i.
> 1.ii.
> 
> Regarding your answer at 2007-01-22. That was for :
> 

Hi Florian,

Florian Reuter wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> for me the result it not so clear. Michael was refering to the HTML lists. However HTML lists simple can't numbering like 1., 1.1, 1.2, .... So the behaviour at this point is undefined.

HTML allows nested lists. Paragraphs contained in nested ODF lists get 
the same numbers as in HTML.

What HTML does not have is a feature that allows to display the number 
of upper levels in addition to the one of the current level. So, HTML 
provides a clue what number a certain list item gets, but indeed not how 
upper levels are displayed.

My comment regarding HTML you are referring to here actually applied to 
the question when numbering restarts. That's what we were discussing in 
that mail. It did not apply to the question how upper levels are displayed.

> 
> In fact my intuitive result would be
> 1.
> 1.i.
> 1.ii.
> 
> Regarding your answer at 2007-01-22. That was for :
>