I don't agree on "require user agents to limit this to no more than 3
times a second".
I must admit that I don't believe a higher frequency would make any
sense for anything, but People have different needs, and if someone for
what every reason needs a higher frequency, the application should be
allowed to support this.
It's something the author should avoid.
Malte.
Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote, On 18.07.08 01:46:
> That is fine. This will just mean we will require user agents and
> authors to limit this to no more than 3 times a second which may cause
> epileptic seizures. If we did not have adequate justification for having
> this level of granularity we could avoid imposing this other
> requirement. ok?
>
> Rich
>
>
>
> Rich Schwerdtfeger
> Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist
> Chair, IBM Accessibility Architecture Review Board
> blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/schwer
> Inactive hide details for "Duane Nickull"