OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC

 View Only
  • 1.  Moving ODF 1.0 Errata 01 forward in SC34?

    Posted 06-01-2009 19:15
    Hi Patrick,
    
    Any idea on the next steps with ODF 1.0 Errata 01?  Since we completed 
    this Approved Errata back last November, there has been complete silence 
    on it in SC34.  It has not even made it onto an SC34 or WG agenda.   Do we 
    need to do something to get this moving? 
    
    Since OASIS is only a liaison we do not have the ability to initiate a New 
    Work Item in SC34.  But the new ad-hoc on ODF Maintenance they are 
    creating doesn't meet until mid September. Is there a way we can get the 
    Errata moving along sooner in a way that respects both the urgency 
    expressed by SC34 when they originally submitted their defect report, as 
    well as our recently agreed to maintenance procedures that calls for SC34 
    to keep ISO/IEC 26300 in synch with OASIS ODF. 
    
    Could you bring this up with SC34 leadership and report back on what their 
    recommended next steps are?
    
    Thanks,
    
    -Rob
    


  • 2.  Re: Moving ODF 1.0 Errata 01 forward in SC34?

    Posted 06-01-2009 19:41
    Rob,
    
    I will send off a note today.
    
    Should have an answer and suggested way forward by our next TC meeting.
    
    Hope you are having a great day!
    
    Patrick
    
    robert_weir@us.ibm.com wrote:
    > Hi Patrick,
    >
    > Any idea on the next steps with ODF 1.0 Errata 01?  Since we completed 
    > this Approved Errata back last November, there has been complete silence 
    > on it in SC34.  It has not even made it onto an SC34 or WG agenda.   Do we 
    > need to do something to get this moving? 
    >
    > Since OASIS is only a liaison we do not have the ability to initiate a New 
    > Work Item in SC34.  But the new ad-hoc on ODF Maintenance they are 
    > creating doesn't meet until mid September. Is there a way we can get the 
    > Errata moving along sooner in a way that respects both the urgency 
    > expressed by SC34 when they originally submitted their defect report, as 
    > well as our recently agreed to maintenance procedures that calls for SC34 
    > to keep ISO/IEC 26300 in synch with OASIS ODF. 
    >
    > Could you bring this up with SC34 leadership and report back on what their 
    > recommended next steps are?
    >
    > Thanks,
    >
    > -Rob
    >
    >   
    
    -- 
    Patrick Durusau
    patrick@durusau.net
    Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
    Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
    Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
    Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
    
    


  • 3.  Re: [office] Re: Moving ODF 1.0 Errata 01 forward in SC34?

    Posted 06-13-2009 15:59
    Patrick,
    
    I just noticed that I don't see our Approved Errata 01 listed in the 
    JTC1/SC34 document repository, although I did send a courtesy note to Sam, 
    Kimura-san and Alex back last November when it was first approved.
    
    Could you, as our newly-appointed liaison, officially transmit this 
    document to the Secretariat and WG1 Convenor, with a courtesy cc to Sam 
    and Francis, and ask for NB's to be informed of its existence? 
    
    I realize that there may be extra work required by you to get this into 
    Technical Corrigenda form, but we have told SC34 that we would transmit 
    all relevant OASIS documents when approved, and our Approved Errata, in 
    its current form certainly is one of them.   This is also in line with the 
    wishes expressed by SC34 in their N0847 where they wrote to us: "SC 34 
    requests that the OASIS ODF TC respond to these defect reports in a timely 
    fashion and publish errata in accordance with OASIS procedures. "  I think 
    they are overdue an official notification that we have done this. 
    
    Thanks!
    
    Regards,
    
    -Rob
    
    
    Patrick Durusau