OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC

 View Only
  • 1.  Re: [office] Drawing page names (Re: [office] OpenDocument TC Meeting Minutes 2006-02-13)

    Posted 11-22-2007 09:23
    On Thursday 22 November 2007, Michael Brauer wrote:
    > Hi,
    > 
    > while integrating this proposal into the specification, I noticed that 
    > it would cause an inconsistency for tables:
    > 
    > Tables are not per se graphical objects, so it seems a little bit 
    > uncommon to add svg elements to them. We had a similar situation for 
    > hyperlinks, where we use an "office:title" attribute instead. I 
    > therefore suggest that we reuse the office:title attribute for tables, 
    > and add an office:desc attribute, too.
    
    I'm a bit confused, because this proposal was about drawing pages only, not
    about tables, wasn't it? I don't mind that we're talking about a title for
    tables since my post from yesterday wants "unique name separated from
    user-visible title" for tables too, but I'm just surprised :)
    
    > I further suggest that specify that the two attributes are ignored, if 
    > the table element is a child of an draw:frame element, because in this 
    > situation, the frame itself has a title and a description.
    
    This confuses me too. table:table cannot be a direct child of draw:frame, can it? (or is this new in odf-1.2?)
    Or do you mean with a draw:text-box as intermediary? But then you could have
    other text before and after the table and then a title+description for the table still makes sense...
    
    -- 
    David Faure, faure@kde.org, sponsored by Trolltech to work on KDE,
    Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org).
    


  • 2.  Re: [office] Drawing page names (Re: [office] OpenDocument TC MeetingMinutes 2006-02-13)

    Posted 11-22-2007 09:54
    Hi David,
    
    David Faure wrote:
    > On Thursday 22 November 2007, Michael Brauer wrote:
    >> Hi,
    >>
    >> while integrating this proposal into the specification, I noticed that 
    >> it would cause an inconsistency for tables:
    >>
    >> Tables are not per se graphical objects, so it seems a little bit 
    >> uncommon to add svg elements to them. We had a similar situation for 
    >> hyperlinks, where we use an "office:title" attribute instead. I 
    >> therefore suggest that we reuse the office:title attribute for tables, 
    >> and add an office:desc attribute, too.
    > 
    > I'm a bit confused, because this proposal was about drawing pages only, not
    > about tables, wasn't it? I don't mind that we're talking about a title for
    > tables since my post from yesterday wants "unique name separated from
    > user-visible title" for tables too, but I'm just surprised :)
    
    You are right. We first talked about drawing pages, but Malte noticed 
    that we have the same or at least a very similar issue for tables, and 
    suggested to add a title and description to them, too.
    
    We don't say this explicitly in the ODF spec, but I think in practice, 
    table names are already unique, because formulas simply don't work if 
    the table names would not be unique. But we of cause need to discuss 
    whether we want to enforce this in the future, as you have suggested.
    
    > 
    >> I further suggest that specify that the two attributes are ignored, if 
    >> the table element is a child of an draw:frame element, because in this 
    >> situation, the frame itself has a title and a description.
    > 
    > This confuses me too. table:table cannot be a direct child of draw:frame, can it? (or is this new in odf-1.2?)
    
    This is new in ODF 1.2. We added that to get support for tables within 
    presentations.
    
    > Or do you mean with a draw:text-box as intermediary? But then you could have
    > other text before and after the table and then a title+description for the table still makes sense...
    > 
    
    Michael
    
    -- 
    Michael Brauer, Technical Architect Software Engineering
    StarOffice/OpenOffice.org
    Sun Microsystems GmbH             Nagelsweg 55
    D-20097 Hamburg, Germany          michael.brauer@sun.com
    http://sun.com/staroffice         +49 40 23646 500
    http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
    
    Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1,
            D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten
    Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028
    Geschaeftsfuehrer: Thomas Schroeder, Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Boemer
    Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering
    
    


  • 3.  Re: [office] Drawing page names (Re: [office] OpenDocument TC Meeting Minutes 2006-02-13)

    Posted 11-22-2007 09:59
    On Thursday 22 November 2007, Michael Brauer wrote:
    > Hi David,
    > 
    > David Faure wrote:
    > > On Thursday 22 November 2007, Michael Brauer wrote:
    > >> Hi,
    > >>
    > >> while integrating this proposal into the specification, I noticed that 
    > >> it would cause an inconsistency for tables:
    > >>
    > >> Tables are not per se graphical objects, so it seems a little bit 
    > >> uncommon to add svg elements to them. We had a similar situation for 
    > >> hyperlinks, where we use an "office:title" attribute instead. I 
    > >> therefore suggest that we reuse the office:title attribute for tables, 
    > >> and add an office:desc attribute, too.
    > > 
    > > I'm a bit confused, because this proposal was about drawing pages only, not
    > > about tables, wasn't it? I don't mind that we're talking about a title for
    > > tables since my post from yesterday wants "unique name separated from
    > > user-visible title" for tables too, but I'm just surprised :)
    > 
    > You are right. We first talked about drawing pages, but Malte noticed 
    > that we have the same or at least a very similar issue for tables, and 
    > suggested to add a title and description to them, too.
    > 
    > We don't say this explicitly in the ODF spec, but I think in practice, 
    > table names are already unique, because formulas simply don't work if 
    > the table names would not be unique. But we of cause need to discuss 
    > whether we want to enforce this in the future, as you have suggested.
    
    OK. Well I suggest that we enforce that table names are unique indeed.
    
    > >> I further suggest that specify that the two attributes are ignored, if 
    > >> the table element is a child of an draw:frame element, because in this 
    > >> situation, the frame itself has a title and a description.
    > > 
    > > This confuses me too. table:table cannot be a direct child of draw:frame, can it? (or is this new in odf-1.2?)
    > 
    > This is new in ODF 1.2. We added that to get support for tables within 
    > presentations.
    
    OK, cool. Another possible data source for chart:data-source-table-name :-)
    
    -- 
    David Faure, faure@kde.org, sponsored by Trolltech to work on KDE,
    Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org).