OASIS Key Management Interoperability Protocol (KMIP) TC

 View Only
  • 1.  Applying to IANA for KMIP ports

    Posted 07-22-2009 23:46
    In the HTTPS proposal, I left the recommended ports for running KMIP over HTTPS as TBD.  Does the group feel we should apply to IANA for one or more ports for KMIP?  If so, I have a couple additional questions:
    
    1.  Should raw KMIP over TLS have a different port than KMIP over HTTPS?
    
    2.  Should there be different ports for serving client-to-server operations versus server-to-client operations?
    
    
    Some information about the registration process can be found here:
    
    http://www.iana.org/cgi-bin/usr-port-number.pl
    
    As this discussion may take some time to resolve, I'm inclined to ask for a vote this week on the most recent version of the HTTPS proposal, which has the port numbers TBD.
    
    Thanks
    
    -Alan
    
    The information contained in this electronic mail transmission 
    may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected 
    from disclosure. If you have received this communication in 
    error, please notify us immediately by replying to this 
    message and deleting it from your computer without copying 
    or disclosing it.
    
    
    


  • 2.  RE: Applying to IANA for KMIP ports

    Posted 07-23-2009 02:50
    Alan,
    I don't think we're quite ready to apply to IANA, but IMO,
    1. - yes.  I think this will simplify (vs. complicate) implementations.
    2. - yes.  I believe the "server to client" operations constitute a different service, and that both security and economy (eg port listeners) suggest separate port numbers.
    
    --Steve Wierenga
    HP
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Frindell,Alan [mailto:Alan.Frindell@safenet-inc.com] 
    Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 4:42 PM
    To: kmip@lists.oasis-open.org
    Subject: [kmip] Applying to IANA for KMIP ports
    
    In the HTTPS proposal, I left the recommended ports for running KMIP over HTTPS as TBD.  Does the group feel we should apply to IANA for one or more ports for KMIP?  If so, I have a couple additional questions:
    
    1.  Should raw KMIP over TLS have a different port than KMIP over HTTPS?
    
    2.  Should there be different ports for serving client-to-server operations versus server-to-client operations?
    
    
    Some information about the registration process can be found here:
    
    http://www.iana.org/cgi-bin/usr-port-number.pl
    
    As this discussion may take some time to resolve, I'm inclined to ask for a vote this week on the most recent version of the HTTPS proposal, which has the port numbers TBD.
    
    Thanks
    
    -Alan
    
    The information contained in this electronic mail transmission may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer without copying or disclosing it.
    
     
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
    https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
    
    


  • 3.  Re: [kmip] RE: Applying to IANA for KMIP ports

    Posted 07-23-2009 13:06
    Hi everyone,
    
       Just jumping in for a quick interception ... any IANA requests need  
    to be processed by OASIS. Basically (when you're ready) someone on the  
    TC should prepare all the necessary information and send it to me;  
    I'll then forward it on.
    
    Regards,
    
    Mary
    
    Mary P McRae
    Director, Standards Development
    Technical Committee Administrator
    OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
    email: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org
    web: www.oasis-open.org
    twitter: fiberartisan  #oasisopen
    phone: 1.603.232.9090
    
    Standards are like parachutes: they work best when they're open.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    On Jul 22, 2009, at 10:49 PM, Wierenga, Steven wrote:
    
    > Alan,
    > I don't think we're quite ready to apply to IANA, but IMO,
    > 1. - yes.  I think this will simplify (vs. complicate)  
    > implementations.
    > 2. - yes.  I believe the "server to client" operations constitute a  
    > different service, and that both security and economy (eg port  
    > listeners) suggest separate port numbers.
    >
    > --Steve Wierenga
    > HP
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Frindell,Alan [mailto:Alan.Frindell@safenet-inc.com]
    > Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 4:42 PM
    > To: kmip@lists.oasis-open.org
    > Subject: [kmip] Applying to IANA for KMIP ports
    >
    > In the HTTPS proposal, I left the recommended ports for running KMIP  
    > over HTTPS as TBD.  Does the group feel we should apply to IANA for  
    > one or more ports for KMIP?  If so, I have a couple additional  
    > questions:
    >
    > 1.  Should raw KMIP over TLS have a different port than KMIP over  
    > HTTPS?
    >
    > 2.  Should there be different ports for serving client-to-server  
    > operations versus server-to-client operations?
    >
    >
    > Some information about the registration process can be found here:
    >
    > http://www.iana.org/cgi-bin/usr-port-number.pl
    >
    > As this discussion may take some time to resolve, I'm inclined to  
    > ask for a vote this week on the most recent version of the HTTPS  
    > proposal, which has the port numbers TBD.
    >
    > Thanks
    >
    > -Alan
    >
    > The information contained in this electronic mail transmission may  
    > be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected from  
    > disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please  
    > notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it  
    > from your computer without copying or disclosing it.
    >
    >
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that  
    > generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
    > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
    >
    >
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
    > generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
    > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
    >
    
    


  • 4.  RE: Applying to IANA for KMIP ports

    Posted 09-16-2009 16:28
    Indra asked me to reopen this topic for discussion, in order to resolve the TBDs in the specification and user guide.  Are we ready to initiate the port application process?  
    
    Thanks
    
    -Alan
    
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Wierenga, Steven [mailto:steve.wierenga@hp.com] 
    > Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 7:49 PM
    > To: Frindell,Alan; kmip@lists.oasis-open.org
    > Subject: RE: Applying to IANA for KMIP ports
    > 
    > Alan,
    > I don't think we're quite ready to apply to IANA, but IMO,
    > 1. - yes.  I think this will simplify (vs. complicate) 
    > implementations.
    > 2. - yes.  I believe the "server to client" operations 
    > constitute a different service, and that both security and 
    > economy (eg port listeners) suggest separate port numbers.
    > 
    > --Steve Wierenga
    > HP
    > 
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Frindell,Alan [mailto:Alan.Frindell@safenet-inc.com] 
    > Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 4:42 PM
    > To: kmip@lists.oasis-open.org
    > Subject: [kmip] Applying to IANA for KMIP ports
    > 
    > In the HTTPS proposal, I left the recommended ports for 
    > running KMIP over HTTPS as TBD.  Does the group feel we 
    > should apply to IANA for one or more ports for KMIP?  If so, 
    > I have a couple additional questions:
    > 
    > 1.  Should raw KMIP over TLS have a different port than KMIP 
    > over HTTPS?
    > 
    > 2.  Should there be different ports for serving 
    > client-to-server operations versus server-to-client operations?
    > 
    > 
    > Some information about the registration process can be found here:
    > 
    > http://www.iana.org/cgi-bin/usr-port-number.pl
    > 
    > As this discussion may take some time to resolve, I'm 
    > inclined to ask for a vote this week on the most recent 
    > version of the HTTPS proposal, which has the port numbers TBD.
    > 
    > Thanks
    > 
    > -Alan
    > 
    > The information contained in this electronic mail 
    > transmission may be privileged and confidential, and 
    > therefore, protected from disclosure. If you have received 
    > this communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
    > replying to this message and deleting it from your computer 
    > without copying or disclosing it.
    > 
    >  
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS 
    > TC that generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your 
    > TCs in OASIS at:
    > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgr
    > oups.php 
    > 
    > The information contained in this electronic mail transmission 
    may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected 
    from disclosure. If you have received this communication in 
    error, please notify us immediately by replying to this 
    message and deleting it from your computer without copying 
    or disclosing it.
    
    
    


  • 5.  Re: [kmip] RE: Applying to IANA for KMIP ports

    Posted 09-16-2009 16:35
    FYI: any IANA applications must be processed through OASIS. When  
    you're ready, provide me with all the necessary information and I'll  
    get it processed.
    
    Regards,
    
    Mary
    
    
    Mary P McRae
    Director, Standards Development
    Technical Committee Administrator
    OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
    email: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org
    web: www.oasis-open.org
    twitter: fiberartisan  #oasisopen
    phone: 1.603.232.9090
    
    Standards are like parachutes: they work best when they're open.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    On Sep 16, 2009, at 12:27 PM, Frindell,Alan wrote:
    
    > Indra asked me to reopen this topic for discussion, in order to  
    > resolve the TBDs in the specification and user guide.  Are we ready  
    > to initiate the port application process?
    >
    > Thanks
    >
    > -Alan
    >
    >> -----Original Message-----
    >> From: Wierenga, Steven [mailto:steve.wierenga@hp.com]
    >> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 7:49 PM
    >> To: Frindell,Alan; kmip@lists.oasis-open.org
    >> Subject: RE: Applying to IANA for KMIP ports
    >>
    >> Alan,
    >> I don't think we're quite ready to apply to IANA, but IMO,
    >> 1. - yes.  I think this will simplify (vs. complicate)
    >> implementations.
    >> 2. - yes.  I believe the "server to client" operations
    >> constitute a different service, and that both security and
    >> economy (eg port listeners) suggest separate port numbers.
    >>
    >> --Steve Wierenga
    >> HP
    >>
    >> -----Original Message-----
    >> From: Frindell,Alan [mailto:Alan.Frindell@safenet-inc.com]
    >> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 4:42 PM
    >> To: kmip@lists.oasis-open.org
    >> Subject: [kmip] Applying to IANA for KMIP ports
    >>
    >> In the HTTPS proposal, I left the recommended ports for
    >> running KMIP over HTTPS as TBD.  Does the group feel we
    >> should apply to IANA for one or more ports for KMIP?  If so,
    >> I have a couple additional questions:
    >>
    >> 1.  Should raw KMIP over TLS have a different port than KMIP
    >> over HTTPS?
    >>
    >> 2.  Should there be different ports for serving
    >> client-to-server operations versus server-to-client operations?
    >>
    >>
    >> Some information about the registration process can be found here:
    >>
    >> http://www.iana.org/cgi-bin/usr-port-number.pl
    >>
    >> As this discussion may take some time to resolve, I'm
    >> inclined to ask for a vote this week on the most recent
    >> version of the HTTPS proposal, which has the port numbers TBD.
    >>
    >> Thanks
    >>
    >> -Alan
    >>
    >> The information contained in this electronic mail
    >> transmission may be privileged and confidential, and
    >> therefore, protected from disclosure. If you have received
    >> this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
    >> replying to this message and deleting it from your computer
    >> without copying or disclosing it.
    >>
    >>
    >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    >> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS
    >> TC that generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your
    >> TCs in OASIS at:
    >> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgr
    >> oups.php
    >>
    >> The information contained in this electronic mail transmission
    > may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected
    > from disclosure. If you have received this communication in
    > error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
    > message and deleting it from your computer without copying
    > or disclosing it.
    >
    >
    >
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
    > generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
    > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
    >