hi Mary -
the intent is that the Statements of Use attest:
1) that the profiles as defined in the normative KMIP Profiles document
have been implemented
2) that the implementations are in conformance with the protocol as
defined in the normative KMIP Specification document
3) that the implementations follow the non-normative guidance in other
KMIP documents, particular the KMIP Use Cases document
Do we need to revise the language to make these assertions clearer? If
so, please suggest alternative language. I assume we particularly want
to be clear that the Statements of Use apply not just to the KMIP
Profiles document, but also to the KMIP Specification document -- this
was certainly the intent of the footnotes.
thanks -
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: Mary McRae [mailto:mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 11:39 AM
To: Griffin, Robert
Cc: kmip@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [kmip] draft Statement of Use from RSA/EMC
So do I understand correctly that this statement of use is only against
document #2?
Regards,
Mary
Mary P McRae
Director, Standards Development
Technical Committee Administrator
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
email: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org
web: www.oasis-open.org
twitter: @fiberartisan #oasisopen
phone: 1.603.232.9090
Standards are like parachutes: they work best when they're open.
On May 27, 2010, at 10:24 AM,