ASYNCHRONOUS_CORRELATION_VALUE_0 and ASYNCHRONOUS_CORRELATION_VALUE are entirely semantically equivalent. I will update that in the next release - but unless there are semantic changes I'll hold off on a new zip file. Tim. On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 6:36 AM Mark Joseph <
mark@p6r.com > wrote: Another minor issue see below <ResponseMessage> <ResponseHeader> <ProtocolVersion> <ProtocolVersionMajor type="Integer" value="2"/> <ProtocolVersionMinor type="Integer" value="1"/> </ProtocolVersion> <TimeStamp type="DateTime" value="$NOW"/> <BatchCount type="Integer" value="1"/> </ResponseHeader> <BatchItem> <Operation type="Enumeration" value="Archive"/> <ResultStatus type="Enumeration" value="OperationPending"/> <AsynchronousCorrelationValue type="ByteString" value="$ASYNCHRONOUS_CORRELATION_VALUE_0"/> </BatchItem> </ResponseMessage> <RequestMessage> <RequestHeader> <ProtocolVersion> <ProtocolVersionMajor type="Integer" value="2"/> <ProtocolVersionMinor type="Integer" value="1"/> </ProtocolVersion> <ClientCorrelationValue type="TextString" value="TC-ASYNC-5-21 step=2"/> <BatchCount type="Integer" value="1"/> </RequestHeader> <BatchItem> <Operation type="Enumeration" value="Process"/> <RequestPayload> <AsynchronousCorrelationValue type="ByteString" value= "$ASYNCHRONOUS_CORRELATION_VALUE"/ > should have "_0" at the end </RequestPayload> </BatchItem> </RequestMessage> Best, Mark Joseph P6R, Inc 408-205-0361