Thanks. I sure don't see any problems with that. The TC members, Dave included, are in a better position than I to know -- and refine the references to the specific works in the final motion the TC may wish to approve. A caution: the colored text in Dave's message may not survive all e-mail readers & the archive. So, in the appended plain text copy below, I have [bracketed] his proposed changes for readability. Regards Jamie ~ James Bryce Clark ~ General Counsel, OASIS ~
http://www.oasis-open.org/who/staff.php#clark www.identi.ca/JamieXML www.twitter.com/JamieXML
http://t.sina.cn/jamiexml http://facebook.com/oasis.open On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Dave Thewlis <
Dave.Thewlis@calconnect.org> wrote: > Looks like something got dropped or morphed inadvertently in the rework. > Here is what it says now (with changes accepted) in blue: > > "A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates > "The committee will deliver a standard schema and semantics for schedule and > interval information for use in other web services. The schema and semantics > will interoperate with the existing iCalendar XML specification and offer > some or all of the functionality of that specification. It is the goal of > the committee and CalConnect to arrange for cross-contributions > of improvements, errata and elaborations to the schema to and from the > iCalendar XML working group and to co-publish and maintain consistent > versions of the final schema in parallel with CalConnect." > > My understanding is that the goal of arranging cross contributions and > maintaining consistent versions is to apply not only to the schema but in > particular to the contributions of CalWS-REST and CalWS-SOAP as referenced > (as inputs) earlier in the document. (II think the flurry of discussion > about schemas may have diverted things unintentionally). > Also it might be clearer if "iCalendar XML working group" is changed to > "CalConnect XML working group" (or technical committee which is what we call > them). > > Suggested changes: [bracket annotations added by Jamie] > "...to arrange for cross-contributions of improvements, errata and > elaborations to the schema [add: "and the CalWS specifications"] to and from the > [delete:"iCalendar", substitute:"CalConnect"] XML working group and to co-publish and > maintain consistent versions of the final schema [add: "and CalWS specifications"] in > parallel with CalConnect." > > Dave > > On Aug 10, 2011, at 8:37 AM, Jamie Clark wrote: > Good morning. We revised the draft TC charter change proposal, for > your review, in light of the recent RFC issuance (congrats) and other > points suggested by Dave. It's attached. > * * *