KMIP-interop-tech

 View Only
  • 1.  Initial interop test results

    Posted 02-12-2019 19:28
      |   view attached
    Hi folks, At this stage, I've completed collating the test results and we do have a range of issues to go through. I suspect we have some test cases to adjust but I'll leave that to the group discussion to decide. I've attached a PDF of the test sheets from a server perspective so you can check the results prior to a discussion on Wednesday afternoon at the usual time (Thursday morning in Australia). If you have any direct concerns, please let me know. Feel free to email the list with any obvious corrections and I'll ensure I'm in a position to clean them up on the call. Thanks, -- 2017-02-24T20:38:00Z 1 19 191 1 1 209 14.00 X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 Tony Cox VP Partners, Alliances & Standards Cryptsoft P: +61 7 3103 0321, US: +1 (650) 918 4307 tony.cox@cryptsoft.com Attachment: SERVER Results.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document

    Attachment(s)

    pdf
    SERVER Results.pdf   165 KB 1 version


  • 2.  Re: [kmip-interop-tech] Initial interop test results

    Posted 02-12-2019 21:14
    The TTLV results for the Thales server looks wrong Best, Mark Joseph P6R,  Inc 408-205-0361 mark@p6r.com On Feb 12, 2019, at 11:27 AM, Tony Cox < tony.cox@cryptsoft.com > wrote: Hi folks, At this stage, I've completed collating the test results and we do have a range of issues to go through. I suspect we have some test cases to adjust but I'll leave that to the group discussion to decide. I've attached a PDF of the test sheets from a server perspective so you can check the results prior to a discussion on Wednesday afternoon at the usual time (Thursday morning in Australia). If you have any direct concerns, please let me know. Feel free to email the list with any obvious corrections and I'll ensure I'm in a  position to clean them up on the call. Thanks, -- 2017-02-24T20:38:00Z 1 19 191 1 1 209 14.00 X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 Tony Cox VP Partners, Alliances & Standards Cryptsoft P:   +61 7 3103 0321, US:   +1 (650) 918 4307 tony.cox@cryptsoft.com <SERVER Results.pdf> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php


  • 3.  RE: [kmip-interop-tech] Initial interop test results

    Posted 02-12-2019 21:19





    Hi Tony,

     

    The claim sheet I sent out last week (TestSheet_QLabs(C)-Crypsoft_J(S)) contained several errors, which I only realized when Bruce sent back the sheet with the P-D items. All 6 of the P-D items actually fail for our client. I have re-run these tests to be certain
    (all protocols). So, there is no dispute in these cases. Please could you update the collated results accordingly.

     

    PKCS11-M-1-20

    QS-M-1-20
    QS-M-2-20
    TC-SJ-1-20
    TC-SJ-1-20
    TC-SJ-1-20
     
    Thanks
    Martin
     
     






      Martin Shannon  Software Developer  QuintessenceLabs W:
    quintessencelabs.com  


     





     Unit 1 Lower Ground 15 Denison St Deakin ACT 2600 P: +61 2 6260 4922  



     





     

     Delivering quantum enhanced cyber-security for over ten years


     





     Find out more at  quintessencelabs.com


     






        


     




     





     



    From: kmip-interop-tech@lists.oasis-open.org <kmip-interop-tech@lists.oasis-open.org>
    On Behalf Of Tony Cox
    Sent: Wednesday, 13 February 2019 6:27 AM
    To: kmip-interop-tech@lists.oasis-open.org
    Subject: [kmip-interop-tech] Initial interop test results


     
    Hi folks,
    At this stage, I've completed collating the test results and we do have a range of issues to go through. I suspect we have some test cases to adjust but I'll leave that to the group discussion to decide. I've attached a PDF of the test sheets from a server
    perspective so you can check the results prior to a discussion on Wednesday afternoon at the usual time (Thursday morning in Australia).
    If you have any direct concerns, please let me know. Feel free to email the list with any obvious corrections and I'll ensure I'm in a  position to clean them up on the call.
    Thanks,


    --



    Tony Cox

    VP Partners, Alliances & Standards

    Cryptsoft

    P:  +61 7 3103 0321, US:  +1 (650) 918 4307
    tony.cox@cryptsoft.com



    ______________________________________________________________________
    This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service for QuintessenceLabs Pty Ltd.
    ______________________________________________________________________






  • 4.  Re: [kmip-interop-tech] Initial interop test results

    Posted 02-12-2019 21:32
    Thanks Martin, I've changed the following to Fail-Verified: PKCS11-M-1-20 - QLabs(C)>Cryptsoft J(S) - TTLV, HTTPS, JSON, XML QS-M-1-20 - QLabs(C)>Cryptsoft J(S) - TTLV, HTTPS, JSON, XML QS-M-2-20 - QLabs(C)>Cryptsoft J(S) - TTLV, HTTPS, JSON, XML TC-SJ-1-20 - QLabs(C)>Cryptsoft J(S) - TTLV, HTTPS, JSON, XML TC-SJ-1-20 - QLabs(C)>Cryptsoft J(S) - TTLV, HTTPS, JSON, XML TC-SJ-1-20 - QLabs(C)>Cryptsoft J(S) - TTLV, HTTPS, JSON, XML Thanks, -Tony 2017-02-24T20:38:00Z 1 19 191 1 1 209 14.00 X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 On 13/02/2019 7:19 am, Martin Shannon wrote: Hi Tony, The claim sheet I sent out last week (TestSheet_QLabs(C)-Crypsoft_J(S)) contained several errors, which I only realized when Bruce sent back the sheet with the P-D items. All 6 of the P-D items actually fail for our client. I have re-run these tests to be certain (all protocols). So, there is no dispute in these cases. Please could you update the collated results accordingly. PKCS11-M-1-20 QS-M-1-20 QS-M-2-20 TC-SJ-1-20 TC-SJ-1-20 TC-SJ-1-20 Thanks Martin Martin Shannon Software Developer QuintessenceLabs W: quintessencelabs.com Unit 1 Lower Ground 15 Denison St Deakin ACT 2600 P: +61 2 6260 4922 Delivering quantum enhanced cyber-security for over ten years Find out more at quintessencelabs.com From: kmip-interop-tech@lists.oasis-open.org <kmip-interop-tech@lists.oasis-open.org> On Behalf Of Tony Cox Sent: Wednesday, 13 February 2019 6:27 AM To: kmip-interop-tech@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [kmip-interop-tech] Initial interop test results Hi folks, At this stage, I've completed collating the test results and we do have a range of issues to go through. I suspect we have some test cases to adjust but I'll leave that to the group discussion to decide. I've attached a PDF of the test sheets from a server perspective so you can check the results prior to a discussion on Wednesday afternoon at the usual time (Thursday morning in Australia). If you have any direct concerns, please let me know. Feel free to email the list with any obvious corrections and I'll ensure I'm in a position to clean them up on the call. Thanks, -- Tony Cox VP Partners, Alliances & Standards Cryptsoft P: +61 7 3103 0321, US: +1 (650) 918 4307 tony.cox@cryptsoft.com ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service for QuintessenceLabs Pty Ltd. ______________________________________________________________________


  • 5.  Re: [kmip-interop-tech] Initial interop test results

    Posted 02-12-2019 21:39
    Tony, Martin had a couple of cut-and-paste oopsies in his note. I would summarize/correct as follows: The TestSheet_QLabs(C)-Crypsoft_J(S) should be amended to show F-V for TC-SJ-2-20 TC-SJ-3-20 (rather than TC-SJ-1-20 repeated twice) Bruce On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 4:32 PM Tony Cox < tony.cox@cryptsoft.com > wrote: Thanks Martin, I've changed the following to Fail-Verified: PKCS11-M-1-20 - QLabs(C)>Cryptsoft J(S) - TTLV, HTTPS, JSON, XML QS-M-1-20 - QLabs(C)>Cryptsoft J(S) - TTLV, HTTPS, JSON, XML QS-M-2-20 - QLabs(C)>Cryptsoft J(S) - TTLV, HTTPS, JSON, XML TC-SJ-1-20 - QLabs(C)>Cryptsoft J(S) - TTLV, HTTPS, JSON, XML TC-SJ-1-20 - QLabs(C)>Cryptsoft J(S) - TTLV, HTTPS, JSON, XML TC-SJ-1-20 - QLabs(C)>Cryptsoft J(S) - TTLV, HTTPS, JSON, XML Thanks, -Tony On 13/02/2019 7:19 am, Martin Shannon wrote: Hi Tony, The claim sheet I sent out last week (TestSheet_QLabs(C)-Crypsoft_J(S)) contained several errors, which I only realized when Bruce sent back the sheet with the P-D items. All 6 of the P-D items actually fail for our client. I have re-run these tests to be certain (all protocols). So, there is no dispute in these cases. Please could you update the collated results accordingly. PKCS11-M-1-20 QS-M-1-20 QS-M-2-20 TC-SJ-1-20 TC-SJ-1-20 TC-SJ-1-20 Thanks Martin Martin Shannon Software Developer QuintessenceLabs W: quintessencelabs.com Unit 1 Lower Ground 15 Denison St Deakin ACT 2600 P: +61 2 6260 4922 Delivering quantum enhanced cyber-security for over ten years Find out more at quintessencelabs.com From: kmip-interop-tech@lists.oasis-open.org <kmip-interop-tech@lists.oasis-open.org> On Behalf Of Tony Cox Sent: Wednesday, 13 February 2019 6:27 AM To: kmip-interop-tech@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [kmip-interop-tech] Initial interop test results Hi folks, At this stage, I've completed collating the test results and we do have a range of issues to go through. I suspect we have some test cases to adjust but I'll leave that to the group discussion to decide. I've attached a PDF of the test sheets from a server perspective so you can check the results prior to a discussion on Wednesday afternoon at the usual time (Thursday morning in Australia). If you have any direct concerns, please let me know. Feel free to email the list with any obvious corrections and I'll ensure I'm in a position to clean them up on the call. Thanks, -- Tony Cox VP Partners, Alliances & Standards Cryptsoft P: +61 7 3103 0321, US: +1 (650) 918 4307 tony.cox@cryptsoft.com ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service for QuintessenceLabs Pty Ltd. ______________________________________________________________________


  • 6.  Re: [kmip-interop-tech] Initial interop test results

    Posted 02-12-2019 21:41
    Correctly executed - incorrectly reported. Cheers, -Tony 2017-02-24T20:38:00Z 1 19 191 1 1 209 14.00 X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 On 13/02/2019 7:38 am, Bruce Rich wrote: Tony, Martin had a couple of cut-and-paste oopsies in his note. I would summarize/correct as follows: The TestSheet_QLabs(C)-Crypsoft_J(S) should be amended to show F-V for TC-SJ-2-20 TC-SJ-3-20 (rather than TC-SJ-1-20 repeated twice) Bruce On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 4:32 PM Tony Cox < tony.cox@cryptsoft.com > wrote: Thanks Martin, I've changed the following to Fail-Verified: PKCS11-M-1-20 - QLabs(C)>Cryptsoft J(S) - TTLV, HTTPS, JSON, XML QS-M-1-20 - QLabs(C)>Cryptsoft J(S) - TTLV, HTTPS, JSON, XML QS-M-2-20 - QLabs(C)>Cryptsoft J(S) - TTLV, HTTPS, JSON, XML TC-SJ-1-20 - QLabs(C)>Cryptsoft J(S) - TTLV, HTTPS, JSON, XML TC-SJ-1-20 - QLabs(C)>Cryptsoft J(S) - TTLV, HTTPS, JSON, XML TC-SJ-1-20 - QLabs(C)>Cryptsoft J(S) - TTLV, HTTPS, JSON, XML Thanks, -Tony On 13/02/2019 7:19 am, Martin Shannon wrote: Hi Tony, The claim sheet I sent out last week (TestSheet_QLabs(C)-Crypsoft_J(S)) contained several errors, which I only realized when Bruce sent back the sheet with the P-D items. All 6 of the P-D items actually fail for our client. I have re-run these tests to be certain (all protocols). So, there is no dispute in these cases. Please could you update the collated results accordingly. PKCS11-M-1-20 QS-M-1-20 QS-M-2-20 TC-SJ-1-20 TC-SJ-1-20 TC-SJ-1-20 Thanks Martin Martin Shannon Software Developer QuintessenceLabs W: quintessencelabs.com Unit 1 Lower Ground 15 Denison St Deakin ACT 2600 P: +61 2 6260 4922 Delivering quantum enhanced cyber-security for over ten years Find out more at quintessencelabs.com From: kmip-interop-tech@lists.oasis-open.org <kmip-interop-tech@lists.oasis-open.org> On Behalf Of Tony Cox Sent: Wednesday, 13 February 2019 6:27 AM To: kmip-interop-tech@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [kmip-interop-tech] Initial interop test results Hi folks, At this stage, I've completed collating the test results and we do have a range of issues to go through. I suspect we have some test cases to adjust but I'll leave that to the group discussion to decide. I've attached a PDF of the test sheets from a server perspective so you can check the results prior to a discussion on Wednesday afternoon at the usual time (Thursday morning in Australia). If you have any direct concerns, please let me know. Feel free to email the list with any obvious corrections and I'll ensure I'm in a position to clean them up on the call. Thanks, -- Tony Cox VP Partners, Alliances & Standards Cryptsoft P: +61 7 3103 0321, US: +1 (650) 918 4307 tony.cox@cryptsoft.com ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service for QuintessenceLabs Pty Ltd. ______________________________________________________________________