EM HAVE SC

 View Only
Expand all | Collapse all

RE: [emergency-have] Tim's next step RE: [emergency-have] EDXL-HAVE-v2.0-wd02 proofed Patti's edit

  • 1.  RE: [emergency-have] Tim's next step RE: [emergency-have] EDXL-HAVE-v2.0-wd02 proofed Patti's edit

    Posted 10-23-2014 11:39
    Sorry – I will NOW take Rex’s version and move forward with it…   Thanks ,     Tim __________________________________________________________   From: Darrell O'Donnell [mailto:darrell.odonnell@continuumloop.com] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 7:37 AM To: Timothy Grapes Subject: Re: [emergency-have] Tim's next step RE: [emergency-have] EDXL-HAVE-v2.0-wd02 proofed Patti's edit   did you mean "not take this version" or "now take this version"?   On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Timothy Grapes < grapesco@outlook.com > wrote: Folks, My understanding is that I will not take this version from Rex and work on the up-front content.  Please advise ASAP otherwise. Regarding the data dictionary, I understand that will be auto-generated so I will not touch that area.  Brian/Darrell, perhaps you could take a look at Rex's data dictionary comments, incorporate into the schema as appropriate so that the gen'd data dictionary contains any DD improvements. Thanks,     Tim __________________________________________________________


  • 2.  Re: [emergency-have] Tim's next step RE: [emergency-have] EDXL-HAVE-v2.0-wd02 proofed Patti's edit

    Posted 10-23-2014 11:47
    Absolutely Tim - thanks for jumping in on this. And thanks to Rex and everyone else! On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Timothy Grapes < grapesco@outlook.com > wrote: Sorry – I will NOW take Rex’s version and move forward with it…   Thanks ,     Tim __________________________________________________________   From: Darrell O'Donnell [mailto: darrell.odonnell@continuumloop.com ] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 7:37 AM To: Timothy Grapes Subject: Re: [emergency-have] Tim's next step RE: [emergency-have] EDXL-HAVE-v2.0-wd02 proofed Patti's edit   did you mean "not take this version" or "now take this version"?   On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Timothy Grapes < grapesco@outlook.com > wrote: Folks, My understanding is that I will not take this version from Rex and work on the up-front content.  Please advise ASAP otherwise. Regarding the data dictionary, I understand that will be auto-generated so I will not touch that area.  Brian/Darrell, perhaps you could take a look at Rex's data dictionary comments, incorporate into the schema as appropriate so that the gen'd data dictionary contains any DD improvements. Thanks,     Tim __________________________________________________________