Please find the IRC log of today's meeting below. Our next meeting will be in two weeks on the 19th of December. ------------- [15:34] Svante Schubert: Agenda ------------ 1. Dial-In 2. Approve the Agenda 3. CT spec status 4. Discussion on operations, e.g. merge paragraph 5. Adjournment [15:35] Oliver-Rainer Wittmann: attendees (so far): Svante, John, Patrick, Oliver [15:37] Svante Schubert: Status from Oliver, summarizing his work and the output on the Wiki [15:38] Svante Schubert:
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-collab/201212/msg00002.html [15:38] Svante Schubert: Operations identified by Oliver as merge operation [15:41] Svante Schubert:
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-collab/201212/msg00007/MCT_-_list_paragraph_merges.pdf [15:41] Svante Schubert: ^^ Johns observations [15:56] Oliver-Rainer Wittmann: I have read Dennis' MCT challenge #2 today and I saw Svante's reply. [15:57] Svante Schubert: My answer to Dennis: [15:57] Svante Schubert:
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-collab/201212/msg00008.html [16:02] Svante Schubert: Do we agree in the following: It is up to the application how the changes of a component are being shown and bundled. Only the information set of changes have to be the same. [16:05] Svante Schubert: Same information set allows that the change operations are equivalent. Like appending the characters 'a', 'b' and 'c' is equal to adding the text 'abc'. [16:08] Oliver-Rainer Wittmann: Thus, yes I agree. I would also go a step furthers: Would be good, if an application could indicate a certain bundling and may be also name it. [16:11] Svante Schubert: Oliver pointed out that we should use the Wiki as first point of collecting use-cases and information, to avoid spreading the information over the list. [16:16] Svante Schubert: Let us as well continue to talk on the list with a previous unfinished interesting scenario: [16:17] Svante Schubert:
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-collab/201210/msg00049.html [16:27] Oliver-Rainer Wittmann: bye