At some point, we need a serious set of discussions about policies. For example, Tal states below that policies are associated with nodes . That is not my interpretation at all. Policies are associated with topologies, not with nodes (and
in fact they are explicitly defined inside the topology template context). We had preliminary discussions last year about extending the policy grammar since (as Tal correctly points out below) policies currently have fairly weak grammar. But as you will
recall, there was significant resistance against making policy grammar more flexible.
Lots of work still to be done