MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
ubl message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Minutes of Atlantic UBL TC call 22 February 2006
MINUTES OF ATLANTIC UBL TC MEETING
16H00 - 18H00 UTC WEDNESDAY 22 FEBRUARY 2006
ATTENDANCE
Jon Bosak (chair)
Mikkel Brun
Tony Coates
Mavis Cournane
Zarella Rendon
Andy Schoka
Sylvia Webb
STANDING ITEMS
Additions to the calendar:
http://ibiblio.org/bosak/ubl/calendar.htm
None.
Subcommittee and team updates to Pacific call status reports
None.
Review of Pacific call
No comments.
BRUSSELS F2F
MC: Need topics.
JB: In theory, the Brussels meeting is mostly about wrapping up
comment disposition and generating new schemas. In practice,
we never know exactly till a few weeks before the meeting.
MC: What about Thursday of meeting week? [CEN offices closed
that day for the Feast of the Ascension]
SW: Have booked a suite at the Holiday Inn.
MB: Think we can rent a conference room in the same hotel for
the day.
ACTION: MB to verify that dk can rent a conference room Thu 25
May.
ACTION: JB to check on possible Sun office in Brussels.
AGREED that we will make Brussels meeting planning a primary
agenda item for the Atlantic TC call 29 March.
ACTION: JB to ask Mark Leitch to attend the TC call 3/29 and to
verify that he will be at the meeting in Brussels.
ACTION ITEM REVIEW
ACTION: MB to check with PB regarding interest in forming an
OASIS UBL LSC for Northern Europe.
MB: PB doesn't have time right now to push this. The
subject will be raised at a meeting of the group in Oslo
next week, but it will be some months before we have a final
decision.
ACTION: BR to send us an updated proposal including a more
extensive use of schematron by [this meeting]; TC to review and
be prepared to discuss in the Atlantic meeting 1 March 2006.
MB: Will ask BR to submit the revised extension proposal.
NDR WORK SESSION
SW: Rather than sending pointers, I have asked DavidK to send
us a detailed explanation of which rules he needs, why he needs
them, and what the impact would be of not having them. He will
review the ATG2 rules against what he's been using. We hope to
have this analysis by next week's Atlantic call.
MC: MG and I have no problem with putting the rules from 1.0
back in if necessary. We have finished our review of the NDR
and will post that tonight with the current checklist as
Appendix A; DavidK should use this in his analysis.
JB: Let's try to wrap this up next week.
Jon Bosak
Chair, OASIS UBL TC
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]