OASIS Universal Business Language (UBL) TC

 View Only

Re: SV: [ubl] Use of LineStatusCode

  • 1.  Re: SV: [ubl] Use of LineStatusCode

    Posted 10-26-2005 15:38
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    ubl message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: Re: SV: [ubl] Use of LineStatusCode


    Mark
    
    If you were to put this to a vote in PSC I'd vote against changing it - with the reasons:
    1. it would take too long (not enough time available) to go back over this now
    2. this is a core part of the UBL procurement documents
    3. just saying it looks inconsistent isn't, to my view, enough
     - generally inconsistencies appear to be so at first glance but looking into it further with the original reasoning often reveals good reasons why something is so - that's my experience in UBL anyway (after all there have been things to consider such as alignment with EDI standards which do have some peculiarities - but sometimes for good reason and usually with an investment of implemenation to consider).
    4 - the rule is to avoid semantic changes where possible and that would especially apply to deletions
    
    All the best
    
    Steve
    
    
    >>> Mark Leitch <ml@tritorr.com> 26/10/05 16:21:21 >>>
    I just want to see consistency in approach.  Either all lines should have a
    Line Status Code or none should.
    
    M
    
    Mark Leitch
    Director - Tritorr Ltd
    Tel.:   +44 1932 821112
    Cell.:  +44 7881 822999
    Mail:   ml@tritorr.com 
    Site:   www.tritorr.com 
    
    
    
    
    
    > From: Stephen Green <stephen_green@bristol-city.gov.uk>
    > Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:06:03 +0100
    > To: <mhb@itst.dk>, <ubl@lists.oasis-open.org>
    > Subject: Re: SV: [ubl] Use of LineStatusCode
    > 
    > What if I can remember there was lots of discussion to add Line Status Code
    > but can't remember all of it and don't have time to go back to all the emails,
    > etc concerning it?
    > 
    > What if we did this to every BIE we didn't personally understand?
    > 
    >>>> Mikkel Hippe Brun <mhb@itst.dk> 26/10/05 14:58:29 >>>
    > 
    > ...
    > 
    > In my opinion LineStatusCode should be removed if someone cannot come up
    > with a good explanation and business case for its use.
    > 
    > - Regards Mikkel
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
    > generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
    > at:
    > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
    > 
    > 
    > 
    
    
    


    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]