MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















ubl message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [ubl] Comparing Codelist Schema Modules




From: Burnsmarty@aol.com
To: abcoates@londonmarketsystems.com, ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 08:05:03 EST









Yup! This is what we need to do.
 
Marty
 
In a message dated 3/26/2004 8:02:34 AM Eastern Standard Time, abcoates@londonmarketsystems.com writes:
> Thanks for looking at the two schemas. Specifically what I understand is
> agreed to is that from the 7.1 version (based on Stephens 7.1 version)
> the simple type and complex type are to be retained.

Thanks.  Just to be clear, does this mean that if Stephen implements item
D3, viz.

====
D3:
7.1: declares complex type 'CurrencyCodeType' with simple content that
extends a global simple type 'CurrencyCodeContentType'
which is an enumerated restriction of 'cludt:CodeContentType'
9.3: declares complex type 'CodeType' with simple content that directly
restricts udt:CodeType' with an enumeration,
without use of a global simple type
====

so that his Schema uses a global simple type, that will be all that is
required?  If not, what else?  Thanks a lot,













[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]